new ability

cody2009 wrote:

u were talking about them going to superbowl.. there is a first for everything.. saints first superbowl.. saints first superbowl loss.. hahah

Haha thats in the future, and no one except God can predict that.. But I do know somethings that was in yalls newspaper headlines.. "Eagles get destroyed by the Cowboys.. TWICE" haha you wanna talk s*** lets go bruh

and whats their record against the eagles this whole decade.. yeah lets talk whens the last time the cowboys been to superbowl.. i know the eagles been their sooner then the cowboys

Browns > All the teams talked about in this topic.

cody2009 wrote:

and whats their record against the eagles this whole decade.. yeah lets talk whens the last time the cowboys been to superbowl.. i know the eagles been their sooner then the cowboys

Haha Dallas has won 5 Super Bowls, Eagles have won...... 0!!!! Eagles vs Cowboys, all time record.. 43-55.. Hmm +12 to Dallas.. Cowboys have been in 8 Super Bowls to the Eagles 2 (they lost both, just in case you were wondering)

The point is they lost. The game should not have been as close as it was shown due to the turnover difference. Vikes played a good game but favre is a CHOKER
Get over it.
Really its over.
If we wanted to make threads of how teams got bullshitted lets go back to the holy roller or the "lateral" in the bills and titans game of 2000.
Every team gets some luck once in a while its just part of the game. If your thinking the refs will make every call than you obviously have not watched football. I know favre got hit but a lot of them were clean except for 2 which only 1 was called.
Now lets move on and watch manning do his work in the Superbowl.

ok... the game shoulda been worse because of the vikings.. the vikings stoped the offense were ever.. stop saying the saints shoulda blow out the viks with those turnovers.. no those turnovers just prevented the viks from blowing out the saints.. u cant say it shoulda been a blow out because the the turnovers.. well their were turnovers and it still wasnt a blow out... 3 of them prevented the viks from scoring.. and whats the cowboys record vs the eagles in the past 20 years...

k doode im saying im suprised that the saints didnt score more on the vikings cuz of all the turnovers you cant actually think the vikings deserved to win that game? they looked so sloppy it wasnt funny. lol ur agrument really is stupid beacuse no matter how hard you try to argue with anyone on this subject fact of the matter is the vikings are gonna be watching the SB. lol so just stop.

cody2009 wrote:

ok... the game shoulda been worse because of the vikings.. the vikings stoped the offense were ever.. stop saying the saints shoulda blow out the viks with those turnovers.. no those turnovers just prevented the viks from blowing out the saints.. u cant say it shoulda been a blow out because the the turnovers.. well their were turnovers and it still wasnt a blow out... 3 of them prevented the viks from scoring.. and whats the cowboys record vs the eagles in the past 20 years...

Haha you say the same thing over and over again "the Vikes should of won but the turnovers", are you really so stupid to make that argument??? That the team that turned the ball over 5 times should of won? Haha you know nothing about football kid, so just shut up before you appear more stupid than you really are

yall are dumb.. im sayin since the saints didnt score more points because of the turnovers then that means that the viks defense was just that good.. look at the stats...the viks fumbled three times in scoring distance.. add 3 touchdowns to the viks.. who actually got blown out.. the saints didnt play better.. the ball bounced their way this game... i have many die hard saints fans from where i am and most of them say the saints shoulda lost... i know the game is over and done.. but i was sayin the saints didnt earn that win.. the viks gave them the game and they still had to have the refs give it to them.. must be the sec refs.. hahaha

cody2009 wrote:

yall are dumb.. im sayin since the saints didnt score more points because of the turnovers then that means that the viks defense was just that good.. look at the stats...the viks fumbled three times in scoring distance.. add 3 touchdowns to the viks.. who actually got blown out.. the saints didnt play better.. the ball bounced their way this game... i have many die hard saints fans from where i am and most of them say the saints shoulda lost... i know the game is over and done.. but i was sayin the saints didnt earn that win.. the viks gave them the game and they still had to have the refs give it to them.. must be the sec refs.. hahaha

The Saints did earn that win!! You don't go to the Super Bowl by not earning it!! You dont get it! Its not like the Vikes got to the 10 yard line and just said here ya go you can have the ball now, the Saints DEFENSE forced turnovers.. DEFENSE is a part of football.. Who really got blown out?? No one.. Look at the stats?? The main one that stands out to me is the one titles SCORE, NO - 31 MIN - 28.. The refs didnt give the game to the Saints, your such an immature prick that theirs no use in even arguing with you, because you cant see what every other person can see.. Its people like you that make this site look like a JOKE

ur a saints fan.. thats why ur saying that.. so ur sayin all those call in overtime... that even the commentators, and saints fans around here said were very questionable.. had nothing to do with the game.. even with that.. the saints won cause of a coin flip... and the help of those reffs.. stop sayin the saints are all that is football.. i admit that the saints won.. but i aint sayin they were the best team in that game.. it goes to show the best team doesnt always win..

and your an eagles fan so i dono why ur fighting so hard for the vikings. lol and im guessing just cuz there commentators ther right? lol and the saints won cuz they were able to secure the ball, vikings werent, the vikings couldnt capitilize when they had the ball, if the vikings were really the better team they would have 1. not turned the ball over, and 2. not allowed the game to go into overtime, they can only blame themselves for that. lol and dude the better team was the saints.... cuz they won... lol doesnt have to be flashy when you win all that matters is that you get the job done. lol

vikings did not deserve to win at all. the saints didnt have a single turnover because they played safe football and put the vikings in bad field position if they got shut down. and the vikings got in good field position but were irresponsible. any way you put it the vikings did not deserve that win. anyways most of the time during regulation the reason the vikings were in the red zone(which they then fucked up) was because of bs penalties. and no i am not a saints fan i wanted the vikings to win this game, but i cant defend them and their irresponsible ball security i am not that ignorant.

plus stupid steve hutchinson picked heads he shuda known tails never fails =/

well ur dumb cause the saints did have a turnover do u not rember yalls first round draft pick from a couple years ago muff the punt return.. so i guess all that you just said was jibberish.... and by they way saints didnt play safe.. if the viks defense had any hands they would had 2 picks at least... the fact of the matter is a football can bounce many ways.. i believe 2/3 games viks would win.. oh and how did the reffs not see the high low on favre that almost finished him

Cody just answer this question.


Do you not get that the game is over?
Really do you?

No one gives a **** how they lost the vikings are the first fucking team in the NFL to get calls no go their way.

ITS OVER.
GET OVER IT.

THE SAINTS SCORED MORE POINTS THAN THE VIKINGS MAKING THEM THE WINNER.
It's not a hard fucking concept.

by the way i am a eagles fan.. but bret favre is from around here and he is a legend( minus all the pics) and i chear for him... and if u know anything about football any given day any given team can win... its not always who is better.. thus the saints won... saints were outmatched on offense and defense, what i say won the game for the saints is 3 wrong call in overtime that about 80 percent of people agree even saints fans, but yall say its cause of the fumbles, and that last minuate pic.. but the game was still tied... none of that before overtime lost the game for the viks.. i would admit when my team got lucky and beat another team...and u say luck cant get u into the superbowl.. if u know about anything about math then u know its about odds... some teams have better percentages.. but sometimes the low percantage wins if u want me to give u an example just ask and i will explain it to you

i know the game is over.. this is not about the viks shoulda won.. but people say that the saints were so much better... but the fact of the matter is they got luck and the viks outmatched the saints.. but the ball bounced the saints way

how do you force 6 fumbles and still only win by 3

the fact that the saints bairly won with as much help as minn gave them is a joke.

see crazy black gets it.. now can these retarted saints fans get it.. by the way in my psychology class today a saints fan said they were gonna win the superbowl because they had tim tebow.. he was dead serious.. most the saints fans around here couldnt list half their team

cody2009 wrote:

well ur dumb cause the saints did have a turnover do u not rember yalls first round draft pick from a couple years ago muff the punt return.. so i guess all that you just said was jibberish.... and by they way saints didnt play safe.. if the viks defense had any hands they would had 2 picks at least... the fact of the matter is a football can bounce many ways.. i believe 2/3 games viks would win.. oh and how did the reffs not see the high low on favre that almost finished him

woulda if they had, your stupid your not worth arguing with.

to be honest i think the saints are the better team out of the 2. but seriously, 6 fumbles, and 2 picks (i think...i cant remember exactly but i think favre threw 2) and you still only win by 3? at home?

vikes lost the game, the saints didnt win it

thats the words i been looking for... saints didnt win the nfc championship... the viks lost it... and u cant argue with saints fans, them and olemiss fans.. i just cant stand them

let the saints fans have there moment in the spotlight, they dont know what its like

just like florida. miami has 5 rings and the best team in college football history so ill give florida there time in the spotlight cause they dont know what its like

cody2009 wrote:

see crazy black gets it.. now can these retarted saints fans get it.. by the way in my psychology class today a saints fan said they were gonna win the superbowl because they had tim tebow.. he was dead serious.. most the saints fans around here couldnt list half their team

im not a saints fan by any means i mean they beat the eagles that pissed me off but whey you say a team gets lucky going to the superbowl it sounds stupid, nobody lucks out getting to the ship, like i said before it doesnt matter how a team does it all that matters is that they do it, i dont get your statement the saints didnt win the NFC championchip the vikings lost it..... if the saints didnt win and niether did the vikings then who the F*** won man?! lol i wanted the vikings to win i thought they deserved it but after all those turnovers man things looked bad, what about that throw farve made at the end of the game? really over the middle late? he should know better than that run slide do whatever you need to do but dont turn it over i mean the ship on the line baby you cant mess up like that and he did, im not blaming brett for the loss teams win together and lose together, i think the whole vikings team helped a lil in the loss. i just dono why your arguing cuz wether you think they should have won or lost fact STILL remains that they won they executed better than the vikings and came out on top, plain and simpl, in my opinion it doesnt matter how you win, as long as you win i dont really care how it happens just that it does, by one two or a million a win is a win. i can kinda see where your commin from, i think the saints shoulda put up more points with all the turnovers but ya know it is what it is, i got nothing against the vikings i think there a great team i think brett should come back and end on a better note, but no matter what any of us say..... NO is going to MIAMI. lol

thats exactly the point. is every game a choke when a team makes a big comeback? no, because the team can either blow the lead or the other team can just play batter and come back. the vikes lost because of the messups they made, not because of anything the saints did. hence me saying the vikes lost the game, the saints didnt win it