| new ability | |
|
+11pkismyname WestFo3 Vaughnilla619 B-__-R-__-B GO4NZONE CapnCrunch jd7680 Th3 Ac3r L3G3ND K1LL3R ticklemeelmo cody2009 15 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
cody2009 Rookie MS Member
Number of posts : 186 Registration date : 2009-12-25
| Subject: new ability 2010-01-25, 01:05 | |
| LUCK... cause the saints got a hell of alot of it today.. they got lucky that the refs are blind.. that bout it | |
|
| |
ticklemeelmo All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 461 Registration date : 2009-11-15
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 01:48 | |
| your crazy if anyone was lucky that game it was the vikings. I wanted the vikings to win but it should not have been anywhere near that close you cant make that many offensive mistakes and expect to win... | |
|
| |
L3G3ND K1LL3R All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 409 Registration date : 2009-12-16
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 02:14 | |
| | |
|
| |
Th3 Ac3r Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1012 Registration date : 2009-12-13
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 08:39 | |
| Dude you dont get to the Super Bowl by getting lucky prick | |
|
| |
cody2009 Rookie MS Member
Number of posts : 186 Registration date : 2009-12-25
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 12:26 | |
| ur dumb yeah u can.saints should clearly get the lucky abillity, cause they had hardly any offense or defense, their defense was adrian peterson fumbling. what gave them the win was 3 bad calls in overtime. 1.they shouldnt got pass interfence cause it was uncatchable, and their hardly was any touching 2.the didnt get the first down cause thomas fumble the ball in the air and recoverd it short of the first down 3. that catch at the end wasnt a catch, it clearly moves alot when he hits the ground and the majority of the ball is on the ground and not underneath plus the whole game they just were tryin to hurt favre with cheap hits,, when the commentators agreed with everything and were shocked with the calls.. that sayin something.. this is the right section cause im talking about a new ability for the saints | |
|
| |
jd7680 Rookie MS Member
Number of posts : 168 Registration date : 2009-08-18
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 12:32 | |
| I dont think they were lucky. I think they had the game handed to them, though. Peterson is a beast but turnovers lose games. Harvin fumbled too, and it led STRAIGHT to a TD. And what about that Pass Interference call in OT? Uncatchable much? A gift, from the refs. | |
|
| |
CapnCrunch Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 818 Registration date : 2009-09-23
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 13:20 | |
| You don't deserve to win a football game with 5 fumbles
You can talk about uncatchable if you want, but the ref called the interference because the defender never turned to locate the ball, then he got lost and pushed off. That is what the ref saw, that is what I saw. You can't go back on the play later and call uncatchable, and it is not reviewable. I have seen that same call many times.
The Saints made less mistakes, and won.
The only new thing EA is going to update from this game is add a fumble rating and call it AP All Day rating.
There are running backs in the league that don't have as many fumbles in their career as he had this season. Maybe even this one game.
Romo fumbles Cowboys lose AP fumbles Vikings lose
What is so hard to understand | |
|
| |
GO4NZONE New MS Member
Number of posts : 9 Registration date : 2010-01-07
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 13:45 | |
| You cannot win the game with that much turnovers. And now we have to listen to Chilly for the next few years! Sigh... | |
|
| |
cody2009 Rookie MS Member
Number of posts : 186 Registration date : 2009-12-25
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 14:15 | |
| thats how hard the viks played especially favre.. with all those turnovers they still shoulda won... that just shows how mismatched this game was... viks murderd the saints.. they got lucky and the game handed to them.. if u take those fumbles away the saints woulda got blown out... they had that many turnovers and they still shoulda won... im just saying... the saints got stop so many times on 3 and short.. they oline was getting pushed around rag dolls.. | |
|
| |
CapnCrunch Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 818 Registration date : 2009-09-23
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 14:23 | |
| If "ifs" and "ands" Were pots and pans Thered be no use For tinkers hands | |
|
| |
cody2009 Rookie MS Member
Number of posts : 186 Registration date : 2009-12-25
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 14:35 | |
| yeah.. im just saying the saints should feel lucky.. they didnt earn it.. and their getting blown up in the sb | |
|
| |
B-__-R-__-B Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1999 Registration date : 2010-01-07
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 14:53 | |
| you cant say they didnt earn that win that was a close, hard fought game, if anyone should feel lucky i would assume it would be the vikings cuz im supprised the saints didnt blow them out with all the turnovers the vikings had, the vikings didnt deserve to win that game, and they showed it, you dont get to turn the ball over that many times at that level of play, and come out with a win. i though both offenses were sloppy at times, the vikings obviously didnt care too much about ball security cuz they sure gave it to the saints a whole lot. the better team won plain and simple, the vikings shot themselves in the foot and they can blame no one but themselves. lol | |
|
| |
cody2009 Rookie MS Member
Number of posts : 186 Registration date : 2009-12-25
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 15:12 | |
| wow.. its the other way around... the saints couldnt do anything to the viks thats why the viks were able to fumble it so much .. they played so much better that the fumbles didnt do that much.... saints got utterly demolished... they were getting stoped on 3rd and short.. look at stats besides turnovers.. viks played better | |
|
| |
B-__-R-__-B Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1999 Registration date : 2010-01-07
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 16:14 | |
| that may be but all in all who came out on top? doesnt matter how s**** or good you played if you dont come out on top in the end it dont mean s***!!! and yess the saints could do something to the vikings its called win.... they won the game fllat out no excuses won the game, i dono how u say the saints got demolished when they came out on top? but whatever, stats really dont mean s*** in a game that only recognizes wins.... either way your argument is futile beacuse the saints are going to the SB, wether or not they win is a whole nother discussion but fact of the matter is..... that the saints are going to MIAMI!!! lol | |
|
| |
CapnCrunch Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 818 Registration date : 2009-09-23
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 17:32 | |
| Look Bro, I am sorry for your Vikings loss And that is a whole lot more sympathy than I got when you guys kicked the ish outta the Cowboys. But here is why it is not luck. When the Vikings knew the Cowboys were coming they also knew that we had a weakness, with hearing at left tackle and a man coming off a broken leg at right tackle. What did they do, they practiced against it.
When the Saints knew that AP has a weakness fumbling They practiced against it They punched those balls out It was not just luck It was skill They earned it
Teach him to hold the ball better | |
|
| |
Th3 Ac3r Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1012 Registration date : 2009-12-13
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 17:33 | |
| - cody2009 wrote:
- yeah.. im just saying the saints should feel lucky.. they didnt earn it.. and their getting blown up in the sb
THEY DIDN'T EARN IT???? ARE YOU KIDDING ME KID?? They go 13-3, and then knock off the 10-6 Cardinals and then the 12-4 Vikings.. Their record at the moment it 15-3, second best in the league, but yet they got lucky by going to the Super Bowl and don't deserve it.. The Saints got utterly demolished?? Thats why they won, huh? Since you win by getting demolished, makes perfect sense.. And guess what, turnovers are a part of football.. That just shows the Vikings poor skill of holding onto the ball.. It was THEIR fault that they fumbled 6 times, and THEIR fault that they threw 2 picks.. It had nothing to do with luck kid.. You don't get to the Super Bowl by getting lucky, or not deserving it.. Aight, you wanna talk penalties?? What about when they called defensive holding on Randall, when all he did was touch the guy within 5 yards of the line of scrimmage.. What about on the reverse where Favre got blown up on the reverse because he tried to cut off McCray and they called a personal foul?? Their were bad calls both ways, so don't even bring that s*** into this and you know it | |
|
| |
Vaughnilla619 Rookie MS Member
Number of posts : 205 Registration date : 2010-01-04
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 17:54 | |
| this guy hahaha... First of all could you have please put this under the right section. Thanks.
Secsecondly to help you clear that up... There was no PI agreed. The 1st down call on 4th down was initially called a 1st down and the replay had no conclusive evidence it wasn't. And that was a catch.
There you go. | |
|
| |
B-__-R-__-B Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1999 Registration date : 2010-01-07
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 17:58 | |
| i thought that hi-lo hit on farve shoulda been a fresh set of downs. lol and that hit by mcray was totally cheap he wasnt even looking to block him or anything, totally unecessary, i agree with the saints gameplan of hitting brett farve and making him really feel like he's 40 but seriously between the whistles man. lol | |
|
| |
cody2009 Rookie MS Member
Number of posts : 186 Registration date : 2009-12-25
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 20:20 | |
| yeah that hi low on favre .. i thought its a fould for going at the qbs legs.. also the viks played threw the fumbles.. it was tied game with the fumbles.. so forget the fumbles. second the got the game givien to them in overtime... viks shoulda won even with those fumbles.. espn commentator today on the review question all those calls in overtime.. he said he thought the only reason that they went towards the saints because they didnt want a big contraversy they wernt brave enof to overturn it... nuff said.. | |
|
| |
B-__-R-__-B Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1999 Registration date : 2010-01-07
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 20:27 | |
| um the saints won and are going to the superbowl nuff said.... LMAO!!! | |
|
| |
cody2009 Rookie MS Member
Number of posts : 186 Registration date : 2009-12-25
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 20:30 | |
| aslong as peyton is playing and they aint playin the chargers they will win.. the colts are tooooooo goood | |
|
| |
B-__-R-__-B Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1999 Registration date : 2010-01-07
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 20:42 | |
| yeah pretty sure i dono where the colts came in, cuz as i remember we were discussing how the vikings LOST! never said anything about how the saints were gonna play the colts or anything like that, lol u may be right about the colts being tooooo goood but theres one thing thats for sure and thats that the vikings arent gooood ENOUGH! LMAO!!!.... i think were all disappointed with the purple p3n!$ eaters. lol nuff said homeboi! lol | |
|
| |
Th3 Ac3r Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1012 Registration date : 2009-12-13
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 20:43 | |
| Haha thank you B R B, the Saints won, end of story.. It doesn't matter how they did it, but they did.. And im not too sure what replay you were looking at, but when Thomas made the jump over the pile on fourth and inches in OT, he clearly made it over | |
|
| |
cody2009 Rookie MS Member
Number of posts : 186 Registration date : 2009-12-25
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 21:05 | |
| u were talking about them going to superbowl.. there is a first for everything.. saints first superbowl.. saints first superbowl loss.. hahah | |
|
| |
B-__-R-__-B Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1999 Registration date : 2010-01-07
| Subject: Re: new ability 2010-01-25, 21:11 | |
| yeah and either way achilles peterson and the purple p3n!$ eaters will be watching! lol | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: new ability | |
| |
|
| |
| new ability | |
|