whos the cheeser here...

okay so i just got out of a game with a dude that was using the ravens and i was ballin out with the texans ( you know!!! lol) all this kid did was nano, nano, nano! every play! so i started gettin in that a** with some screens, i FL screened him, slot screened him, HB screened him, i mean it was crazy how many screens i threw at him and the only reason why i did it was cuz he wouldnt stop nanoing. he then calls me a cheeser and said i got lucky aftery blowing holes in his "vaulted" ravens D it ended up being 45 to 14 and on D i played him straight up for the most part i didnt nano all but maybe two times and they didnt even hit home, with his nano he had 2 sacks with johnson and ngata, and ray had a pick, while mario williams had 5 alone! and that was just manually rushing off the edge, ryans had 3 picks and wilson had another. lol so my question is who was the cheeser here???? was i in the wrong? or was he? i wouldnt have thrown all those screens if he hadnt nano'd every down. your thoughts... please and thank you!

it sounds like neither of you were cheesing, nanos arent cheese b/c theyre easy to beat. and screens are a good way to beat them, he just sounds like a sore loser to me.

Hahaha it's called read and react... He blitzes every play hit the screen. If he wanted to stop your screens then he should have stopped using nano blitz. I got your back on this one.

Yup. The guy was asking for it. If he can't do anything but Nano blitz, then any smart person is going to exploit that. He wasn't smart enough to change, so its his fault not yours he lost.

Thats what football is all about. Adjusting to what the defense or offense throws at you to be successssssssfuuuuuul.

B-__-R-__-B wrote:

okay so i just got out of a game with a dude that was using the ravens and i was ballin out with the texans ( you know!!! lol) all this kid did was nano, nano, nano! every play! so i started gettin in that a** with some screens, i FL screened him, slot screened him, HB screened him, i mean it was crazy how many screens i threw at him and the only reason why i did it was cuz he wouldnt stop nanoing. he then calls me a cheeser and said i got lucky aftery blowing holes in his "vaulted" ravens D it ended up being 45 to 14 and on D i played him straight up for the most part i didnt nano all but maybe two times and they didnt even hit home, with his nano he had 2 sacks with johnson and ngata, and ray had a pick, while mario williams had 5 alone! and that was just manually rushing off the edge, ryans had 3 picks and wilson had another. lol so my question is who was the cheeser here???? was i in the wrong? or was he? i wouldnt have thrown all those screens if he hadnt nano'd every down. your thoughts... please and thank you!

first...that cat made my Ravens look bad letting you put up 45 pts on that stellar defense they have.

second...you should have blasted him with all of those screens. most cats automatically assume that we Ravens users will just blitz the majority of the game and therefore "attempt" to just (as you did) screen us all game. that dude was a rook! he should have mixed in some Cover 2's, Man defenses and CB blitzes in with those nanos to counter-act all that screening.

3rd..GOOD WIN FOR YOU!

Militant X 1 wrote:

B-__-R-__-B wrote:

okay so i just got out of a game with a dude that was using the ravens and i was ballin out with the texans ( you know!!! lol) all this kid did was nano, nano, nano! every play! so i started gettin in that a** with some screens, i FL screened him, slot screened him, HB screened him, i mean it was crazy how many screens i threw at him and the only reason why i did it was cuz he wouldnt stop nanoing. he then calls me a cheeser and said i got lucky aftery blowing holes in his "vaulted" ravens D it ended up being 45 to 14 and on D i played him straight up for the most part i didnt nano all but maybe two times and they didnt even hit home, with his nano he had 2 sacks with johnson and ngata, and ray had a pick, while mario williams had 5 alone! and that was just manually rushing off the edge, ryans had 3 picks and wilson had another. lol so my question is who was the cheeser here???? was i in the wrong? or was he? i wouldnt have thrown all those screens if he hadnt nano'd every down. your thoughts... please and thank you!

first...that cat made my Ravens look bad letting you put up 45 pts on that stellar defense they have.

second...you should have blasted him with all of those screens. most cats automatically assume that we Ravens users will just blitz the majority of the game and therefore "attempt" to just (as you did) screen us all game. that dude was a rook! he should have mixed in some Cover 2's, Man defenses and CB blitzes in with those nanos to counter-act all that screening.

3rd..GOOD WIN FOR YOU!

thats why i was so supprised it was so easy cuz i always have trouble with that ravens D propably the only D in the game besides SD and DAL that i respect going into a game. don worry man i didnt let this rook ruin the ravens rep. in my eyes there still beastly!!! lol real talk!

B-__-R-__-B wrote:

thats why i was so supprised it was so easy cuz i always have trouble with that ravens D propably the only D in the game besides SD and DAL that i respect going into a game. don worry man i didnt let this rook ruin the ravens rep. in my eyes there still beastly!!! lol real talk!

lol! thanks B!

i woulda told him to rematch,and then beat his a** again