HOW BOUT THEM COWBOY'S.

SiCK WiTH SKiLL wrote:

s0liddy wrote:

I like the Vikes deep threats more than the Eagles and Texans, for sure.

LMFAO. i nominate this dude for 2009-10 toolbag of the year award.

Yeah Johnson, Jones, and sometimes Davis are not deep threats at all.

P.S. look at who the #1 QB in yards was this year.. here, let me help.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/stats/byposition?pos=QB&conference=NFL&year=season_2009&sort=4&timeframe=ToDate

Excuse me for interjecting a little common sense here, but the Texans and the Eagles are done. So what??

Can you take that sh!t somewhere else or wait til after the playoffs for that argument?

s0liddy wrote:

SiCK WiTH SKiLL wrote:

s0liddy wrote:

I like the Vikes deep threats more than the Eagles and Texans, for sure.

LMFAO. i nominate this dude for 2009-10 toolbag of the year award.

Yeah Johnson, Jones, and sometimes Davis are not deep threats at all.

P.S. look at who the #1 QB in yards was this year.. here, let me help.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/stats/byposition?pos=QB&conference=NFL&year=season_2009&sort=4&timeframe=ToDate

So you're saying that the Texans are more of a deep threat than the Vikes because Schaub has the most yards? I guess that means Miles Austin is more of a deep threat than DeSean Jackson. I guess Wes Welker is more of a deep threat than D Jack too.

God I really do own you "Sick With Skill"

ANDRE JOHNSON is the best wr in the league thats why.

And the viks do have the wr's to go deep on dallas.

super_mario90 wrote:

And the viks do have the wr's to go deep on dallas.

That's it, that's all you could think of.

I bring you matchups problems and situational defense.
And you say, they have Wide Recievers.
I bring you a thoughtful breakdown based on what I hear and read
And you give me the wide recievers names
I break it down even further and give you the weaknesses that the Vikings can exploit
And you come back with, they have wide recievers, AGAIN

DUDE, my granddaughter knows they have wide recievers
And she can read the roster too

Get that "Weak" sh!t outta here
I challenge you to actually bring a valid argument into this forum

s0liddy wrote:

SiCK WiTH SKiLL wrote:

s0liddy wrote:

I like the Vikes deep threats more than the Eagles and Texans, for sure.

LMFAO. i nominate this dude for 2009-10 toolbag of the year award.

Yeah Johnson, Jones, and sometimes Davis are not deep threats at all.

P.S. look at who the #1 QB in yards was this year.. here, let me help.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/stats/byposition?pos=QB&conference=NFL&year=season_2009&sort=4&timeframe=ToDate

So you're saying that the Texans are more of a deep threat than the Vikes because Schaub has the most yards? I guess that means Miles Austin is more of a deep threat than DeSean Jackson. I guess Wes Welker is more of a deep threat than D Jack too.

God I really do own you "Sick With Skill"

Lmao, you are a clueless toolbag that cannot read whole posts.

Dallas' center has more of a deep threat then Austin, and Romo.

As seen below.

SiCK WiTH SKiLL wrote:

s0liddy wrote:

SiCK WiTH SKiLL wrote:

s0liddy wrote:

I like the Vikes deep threats more than the Eagles and Texans, for sure.

LMFAO. i nominate this dude for 2009-10 toolbag of the year award.

Yeah Johnson, Jones, and sometimes Davis are not deep threats at all.

P.S. look at who the #1 QB in yards was this year.. here, let me help.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/stats/byposition?pos=QB&conference=NFL&year=season_2009&sort=4&timeframe=ToDate

So you're saying that the Texans are more of a deep threat than the Vikes because Schaub has the most yards? I guess that means Miles Austin is more of a deep threat than DeSean Jackson. I guess Wes Welker is more of a deep threat than D Jack too.

God I really do own you "Sick With Skill"

Lmao, you are a clueless toolbag that cannot read whole posts.

Dallas' center has more of a deep threat then Austin, and Romo.

As seen below.

How am I clueless? You're the one who is basing "deep threats" off of yards. So you admit Miles Austin and Wes Welker are more of a deep threat than D Jack.

Dumbass.

CapnCrunch wrote:

super_mario90 wrote:

And the viks do have the wr's to go deep on dallas.

That's it, that's all you could think of.

I bring you matchups problems and situational defense.
And you say, they have Wide Recievers.
I bring you a thoughtful breakdown based on what I hear and read
And you give me the wide recievers names
I break it down even further and give you the weaknesses that the Vikings can exploit
And you come back with, they have wide recievers, AGAIN

DUDE, my granddaughter knows they have wide recievers
And she can read the roster too

Get that "Weak" sh!t outta here
I challenge you to actually bring a valid argument into this forum

if AP is having a good day then expect either sidney rice or bernard berrian to have a nice day receiving newman will be covering rice so i wouldn't expect to much from rice but he can still make a big play down the feild on newman ealier in the season newman got beat by tampa bays 2nd wr michael clayton for a 50 yard catch and clayton ain't even that good.

But if mike jenkins is gonna play BNR with berrian he's gonna bet burned miserably even if he plays off coveredge he'll still have a good chance at getting burned berrian is that exsplosive i wouldn't sleep on these vikings wr's.

you act like it impossible for BRETT FAVRE to pass the ball something he's been doing his entire career.

You make some good points
Berrians got some jets so he could possibly beat Jenks, but then your gonna have to help over the top. Perhaps if you put Berrian against Newman, he can be beat, get Shancoe to get Sensabaugh to bite on a move. Then you got something, maybe. But I still think that since the Cowboys play a lot of 2 deep and umbrella coverage, the Vikes are gonna take the underneath stuff.

Also, I never said Favre couldn't throw, I just think he's to smart to throw into double coverage. Which is what the Cowboys will have in the deep part of the field. I believe they are the number 1 defense at not allowing the big play.

Either way, at least you gave me something to think about.
Good post

no matter how dallas is playing or how the viks are playing favre will have to play his best if the viks are gonna have a chance at winning.