Desean Jackson OR Miles Austin

Austin is a better receiver than Jackson. Much stronger, slightly less quick, but can break tackles more than Jackson while Jackson can "possibly" elude more.

Jackson is the better return man for sure, even though Miles doesn't return.

Desean is clearly the better wr he's more dangerous and can give you that BOMB down the feild on any given play and can get YAC on short passes and he can even rush Desean is more versatile and exsplosive than miles austin.

austin can't go deep he's just good at breaking tackles and short receptions.

super_mario90 wrote:

Desean is clearly the better wr he's more dangerous and can give you that BOMB down the feild on any given play and can get YAC on short passes and he can even rush Desean is more versatile and exsplosive than miles austin.

austin can't go deep he's just good at breaking tackles and short receptions.

Yeah I would definitely say D Jack is much better than A Johnson, for sure.

I would rank it:

1.Austin
2.D Jack
3. A Johnson

^^^^ kids don't do drugs.^^^^

you guys are so stupid desean hasnt done s*** against the cowboys... hes garbage against experencied corners and fast ones... overated cocky douche.miles austin teared teams apart like them fag eagles.


JAWS OUT.

miles austin has 47 catches vs teams with a below 500. record (thats more then half his receptions

miles austin also only broke 7 catches 4 times vs teams with above 500. records

that sounds like padding his stats vs bad teams now doesnt it???

you know who else has had a great one year? kevin jones. where is he at now?

all you boys fans are so damn quick to crown this guy to be some great WR who will make pro bowls for years to come

he had ONE GOOD YEAR!!!!!!! lots of players have done that, and lots of them fell off the charts

Austin, But I would like to see him do this years to come. So far he has shown good route running and the ability to get down field for the catch and after the catch. For someone that has played as a starter all season He has played great.

Jackson has been great this year but he only has his speed. I haven't watched all the games but the ones that I have I haven't really seen him do a good job at route running. He is a deep threat but if he injures one of his legs there goes your deep threat and not much to work with as a receiver.

Given most of all receivers will have bad game and be shutdown time to time.
Even the creme of the crop Andre Johnson, Randy Moss...... has.

crazyblack001 wrote:

miles austin has 47 catches vs teams with a below 500. record (thats more then half his receptions

miles austin also only broke 7 catches 4 times vs teams with above 500. records

that sounds like padding his stats vs bad teams now doesnt it???

you know who else has had a great one year? kevin jones. where is he at now?

all you boys fans are so damn quick to crown this guy to be some great WR who will make pro bowls for years to come

he had ONE GOOD YEAR!!!!!!! lots of players have done that, and lots of them fell off the charts

No one is doing that. We are living in the now, not the past or future. He is doing great right now so give him props.

And no, not many people can do what he does, whether they were washouts or became greats, we will see what Austin turns out to be. In game he's a mid 80 rated receiver, sounds pretty reasonable to me, lets see how he does next year before he's in the 90s and considered a great receiver.

super_mario90 wrote:

Desean is clearly the better wr he's more dangerous and can give you that BOMB down the feild on any given play and can get YAC on short passes and he can even rush Desean is more versatile and exsplosive than miles austin.

austin can't go deep he's just good at breaking tackles and short receptions.

You say the same s*** every post and it's still wrong, bro.

Austin has 3 more catches of 20+ yards and only 2 less 40+ yard catches than Jackson, how is he not as much a deep threat as Jackson?

s0liddy wrote:

super_mario90 wrote:

Desean is clearly the better wr he's more dangerous and can give you that BOMB down the feild on any given play and can get YAC on short passes and he can even rush Desean is more versatile and exsplosive than miles austin.

austin can't go deep he's just good at breaking tackles and short receptions.

Yeah I would definitely say D Jack is much better than A Johnson, for sure.

I would rank it:

1.Austin
2.D Jack
3. A Johnson

i want what you're smoking.

xjawsxwasxhere28 wrote:

you guys are so stupid desean hasnt done s*** against the cowboys... hes garbage against experencied corners and fast ones... overated cocky douche.miles austin teared teams apart like them fag eagles.


JAWS OUT.

Most of miles austin's big games came against bad Defenses.

and thats a fact.

dracocepheus wrote:

Austin, But I would like to see him do this years to come. So far he has shown good route running and the ability to get down field for the catch and after the catch. For someone that has played as a starter all season He has played great.

Jackson has been great this year but he only has his speed. I haven't watched all the games but the ones that I have I haven't really seen him do a good job at route running. He is a deep threat but if he injures one of his legs there goes your deep threat and not much to work with as a receiver.

Given most of all receivers will have bad game and be shutdown time to time.
Even the creme of the crop Andre Johnson, Randy Moss...... has.

jeremy maclin is a deep threat so if Desean gets hurt maclin would be the one catching all the deep balls.

[quote="s0liddy"]

crazyblack001 wrote:

miles austin has 47 catches vs teams with a below 500. record (thats more then half his receptions

miles austin also only broke 7 catches 4 times vs teams with above 500. records

that sounds like padding his stats vs bad teams now doesnt it???

you know who else has had a great one year? kevin jones. where is he at now?

all you boys fans are so damn quick to crown this guy to be some great WR who will make pro bowls for years to come

he had ONE GOOD YEAR!!!!!!! lots of players have done that, and lots of them fell off the charts

No one is doing that. We are living in the now, not the past or future. He is doing great right now so give him props.

And no, not many people can do what he does, whether they were washouts or became greats, we will see what Austin turns out to be. In game he's a mid 80 rated receiver, sounds pretty reasonable to me, lets see how he does next year before he's in the 90s and considered a great receiver.[quote]

YOU F*CKING DUMB AZZ MADDEN RATINGS MEAN NOTHING YOU CAN'T JUDGE A WR BECAUSE OF HIS MADDEN RATING WHAT A DUMB AZZ MADDEN RATINGS AREN'T PRESICE OR REALISTIC.

hof8231 wrote:

super_mario90 wrote:

Desean is clearly the better wr he's more dangerous and can give you that BOMB down the feild on any given play and can get YAC on short passes and he can even rush Desean is more versatile and exsplosive than miles austin.

austin can't go deep he's just good at breaking tackles and short receptions.

You say the same s*** every post and it's still wrong, bro.

Austin has 3 more catches of 20+ yards and only 2 less 40+ yard catches than Jackson, how is he not as much a deep threat as Jackson?

Because Desean catches balls over 50 yards miles austin catches short receptions and runs after the catch thats not a deep threat.

Desean is capable of a 50 yard catch on any given play.

i don't even think miles austin ever CAUGHT A PASS OVER 50 YARDS this season he's caught short receptions and turned them into 40 yard plays but that don't make him a deep threat the big games he's had this season are mainly because he went against BAD DEFENSE'S.

[quote="super_mario90"][quote="s0liddy"]

crazyblack001 wrote:

miles austin has 47 catches vs teams with a below 500. record (thats more then half his receptions

miles austin also only broke 7 catches 4 times vs teams with above 500. records

that sounds like padding his stats vs bad teams now doesnt it???

you know who else has had a great one year? kevin jones. where is he at now?

all you boys fans are so damn quick to crown this guy to be some great WR who will make pro bowls for years to come

he had ONE GOOD YEAR!!!!!!! lots of players have done that, and lots of them fell off the charts

No one is doing that. We are living in the now, not the past or future. He is doing great right now so give him props.

And no, not many people can do what he does, whether they were washouts or became greats, we will see what Austin turns out to be. In game he's a mid 80 rated receiver, sounds pretty reasonable to me, lets see how he does next year before he's in the 90s and considered a great receiver.

Quote :

YOU F*CKING DUMB AZZ MADDEN RATINGS MEAN NOTHING YOU CAN'T JUDGE A WR BECAUSE OF HIS MADDEN RATING WHAT A DUMB AZZ MADDEN RATINGS AREN'T PRESICE OR REALISTIC.

Damn kid you raging? Learn how to spell before you try to sound intelligent. Austin is a mid 80 rated receiver in game and it shows in real life, if you can't see the comparison then maybe you should go back to school. Actually, scratch that, you do need to go back to school

super_mario90 wrote:

hof8231 wrote:

super_mario90 wrote:

Desean is clearly the better wr he's more dangerous and can give you that BOMB down the feild on any given play and can get YAC on short passes and he can even rush Desean is more versatile and exsplosive than miles austin.

austin can't go deep he's just good at breaking tackles and short receptions.

You say the same s*** every post and it's still wrong, bro.

Austin has 3 more catches of 20+ yards and only 2 less 40+ yard catches than Jackson, how is he not as much a deep threat as Jackson?

Because Desean catches balls over 50 yards miles austin catches short receptions and runs after the catch thats not a deep threat.

Desean is capable of a 50 yard catch on any given play.

i don't even think miles austin ever CAUGHT A PASS OVER 50 YARDS this season he's caught short receptions and turned them into 40 yard plays but that don't make him a deep threat the big games he's had this season are mainly because he went against BAD DEFENSE'S.

So basically what you're saying without realizing it is that Austin is a more versatile receiver. I'd rather have someone who can turn a slant into 40 yards than someone who pretty much just runs flys/posts. Austin is the better route runner and is more mature mentally than Jackson, and that's not debatable.

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=0&statisticCategory=RECEIVING&conference=null&season=2009&seasonType=REG&d-447263-s=RECEIVING_YARDS&d-447263-o=2&d-447263-n=1

M. Austin, 3rd in receiving yards, 20 more catches than D Jack.

M. Austin, longest was 60 yards for a TD, D Jack 71 yards for a TD

Catches for 40 yards+: D Jack has 10, A Johnson has 9, M Austin has 8. Oh Wes Welker has only 3 catches for 40+ yards, ya hes nothing special.V Jackson, 4 catches for 40+, hes nothing special and definitely not a deep threat. S Holmes 3 catches for 40+, hes garbage. Reggie Wayne 1 catch for 40+, WOW HORRIBLE.

Larry Fitzgerald's longest catch was 34 yards, HAHAHHA, wow he's nothing special, hes definitely not a deep threat.

shhhhhhhhhh football kiddies

[quote="s0liddy"][quote="super_mario90"]

s0liddy wrote:

crazyblack001 wrote:

miles austin has 47 catches vs teams with a below 500. record (thats more then half his receptions

miles austin also only broke 7 catches 4 times vs teams with above 500. records

that sounds like padding his stats vs bad teams now doesnt it???

you know who else has had a great one year? kevin jones. where is he at now?

all you boys fans are so damn quick to crown this guy to be some great WR who will make pro bowls for years to come

he had ONE GOOD YEAR!!!!!!! lots of players have done that, and lots of them fell off the charts

No one is doing that. We are living in the now, not the past or future. He is doing great right now so give him props.

And no, not many people can do what he does, whether they were washouts or became greats, we will see what Austin turns out to be. In game he's a mid 80 rated receiver, sounds pretty reasonable to me, lets see how he does next year before he's in the 90s and considered a great receiver.

Quote :

YOU F*CKING DUMB AZZ MADDEN RATINGS MEAN NOTHING YOU CAN'T JUDGE A WR BECAUSE OF HIS MADDEN RATING WHAT A DUMB AZZ MADDEN RATINGS AREN'T PRESICE OR REALISTIC.

Damn kid you raging? Learn how to spell before you try to sound intelligent. Austin is a mid 80 rated receiver in game and it shows in real life, if you can't see the comparison then maybe you should go back to school. Actually, scratch that, you do need to go back to school

i misspelled nothing and i wasn't "RAGING" i just accidentally pressed the caps lock button.

s0liddy wrote:

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=0&statisticCategory=RECEIVING&conference=null&season=2009&seasonType=REG&d-447263-s=RECEIVING_YARDS&d-447263-o=2&d-447263-n=1

M. Austin, 3rd in receiving yards, 20 more catches than D Jack.

M. Austin, longest was 60 yards for a TD, D Jack 71 yards for a TD

Catches for 40 yards+: D Jack has 10, A Johnson has 9, M Austin has 8. Oh Wes Welker has only 3 catches for 40+ yards, ya hes nothing special.V Jackson, 4 catches for 40+, hes nothing special and definitely not a deep threat. S Holmes 3 catches for 40+, hes garbage. Reggie Wayne 1 catch for 40+, WOW HORRIBLE.

Larry Fitzgerald's longest catch was 34 yards, HAHAHHA, wow he's nothing special, hes definitely not a deep threat.

shhhhhhhhhh football kiddies"

Now you wanna talk about "shhhhhhhhhh football kiddies

"

1st off to say wes welker,v.jackson,s.holmes,reggie wayne,larry fitzgeraldare all horrible,terrible,and aren't deep threats makes no sense.

the names that are highlighted are all deep threats.

Just because those guys didn't have many deep plays all season long don't mean their not deep threats they are already proven to be some of the most DYNAMIC players going down the feild because those wr's didn't have as many plays down the feild like they should've don't mean you can say "oh they ain't a deep threat" you can't take that away from them.

and miles austin 40 yard plays came from little short receptions and he just ran after the catch getting more yards then what the original pass was that doesn't make him a deep threat it's not like austin caught all those 40 yard plays 40 yards deep like DRE did (cough cough ).

moral of the story MILES AUSTIN AIN'T A DEEP THREAT.

super_mario90 wrote:

s0liddy wrote:

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=0&statisticCategory=RECEIVING&conference=null&season=2009&seasonType=REG&d-447263-s=RECEIVING_YARDS&d-447263-o=2&d-447263-n=1

M. Austin, 3rd in receiving yards, 20 more catches than D Jack.

M. Austin, longest was 60 yards for a TD, D Jack 71 yards for a TD

Catches for 40 yards+: D Jack has 10, A Johnson has 9, M Austin has 8. Oh Wes Welker has only 3 catches for 40+ yards, ya hes nothing special.V Jackson, 4 catches for 40+, hes nothing special and definitely not a deep threat. S Holmes 3 catches for 40+, hes garbage. Reggie Wayne 1 catch for 40+, WOW HORRIBLE.

Larry Fitzgerald's longest catch was 34 yards, HAHAHHA, wow he's nothing special, hes definitely not a deep threat.

shhhhhhhhhh football kiddies"

Now you wanna talk about "shhhhhhhhhh football kiddies

"

1st off to say wes welker,v.jackson,s.holmes,reggie wayne,larry fitzgeraldare all horrible,terrible,and aren't deep threats makes no sense.

the names that are highlighted are all deep threats.

Just because those guys didn't have many deep plays all season long don't mean their not deep threats they are already proven to be some of the most DYNAMIC players going down the feild because those wr's didn't have as many plays down the feild like they should've don't mean you can say "oh they ain't a deep threat" you can't take that away from them.

and miles austin 40 yard plays came from little short receptions and he just ran after the catch getting more yards then what the original pass was that doesn't make him a deep threat it's not like austin caught all those 40 yard plays 40 yards deep like DRE did (cough cough ).

moral of the story MILES AUSTIN AIN'T A DEEP THREAT.

He was being sarcastic fucknut. He was making fun of you.

^^^^i know he was being sarcastic but in a way i felt that he was being serious cause he's a dumb b*tch! for thinking miles austin is some kind of deep threat.

MILES AUSTIN DON'T EVEN GO DEEP.

(when my letters are all capitalized that doesn't mean im shouting)

hof8231 wrote:

super_mario90 wrote:

s0liddy wrote:

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=0&statisticCategory=RECEIVING&conference=null&season=2009&seasonType=REG&d-447263-s=RECEIVING_YARDS&d-447263-o=2&d-447263-n=1

M. Austin, 3rd in receiving yards, 20 more catches than D Jack.

M. Austin, longest was 60 yards for a TD, D Jack 71 yards for a TD

Catches for 40 yards+: D Jack has 10, A Johnson has 9, M Austin has 8. Oh Wes Welker has only 3 catches for 40+ yards, ya hes nothing special.V Jackson, 4 catches for 40+, hes nothing special and definitely not a deep threat. S Holmes 3 catches for 40+, hes garbage. Reggie Wayne 1 catch for 40+, WOW HORRIBLE.

Larry Fitzgerald's longest catch was 34 yards, HAHAHHA, wow he's nothing special, hes definitely not a deep threat.

shhhhhhhhhh football kiddies"

Now you wanna talk about "shhhhhhhhhh football kiddies

"

1st off to say wes welker,v.jackson,s.holmes,reggie wayne,larry fitzgeraldare all horrible,terrible,and aren't deep threats makes no sense.

the names that are highlighted are all deep threats.

Just because those guys didn't have many deep plays all season long don't mean their not deep threats they are already proven to be some of the most DYNAMIC players going down the feild because those wr's didn't have as many plays down the feild like they should've don't mean you can say "oh they ain't a deep threat" you can't take that away from them.

and miles austin 40 yard plays came from little short receptions and he just ran after the catch getting more yards then what the original pass was that doesn't make him a deep threat it's not like austin caught all those 40 yard plays 40 yards deep like DRE did (cough cough ).

moral of the story MILES AUSTIN AIN'T A DEEP THREAT.

He was being sarcastic fucknut. He was making fun of you.

I don't even know why I am here discussing football with some of these neanderthals lol. This is pathetic...

super_mario90 wrote:

^^^^i know he was being sarcastic but in a way i felt that he was being serious cause he's a dumb b*tch! for thinking miles austin is some kind of deep threat.

MILES AUSTIN DON'T EVEN GO DEEP.

(when my letters are all capitalized that doesn't mean im shouting)

OH, BUT HE DOES. WHAT'S "GOING TO DEEP" TO YOU? CUZ TO ME GOING DEEP IS ANYTIME YOU RUN 30+ YARDS DOWN THE FIELD BEFORE YOU CATCH THE BALL, WHICH AUSTIN DOES QUITE OFTEN.

(when my letters are all caps it means you're wrong/dumb.)

s0liddy wrote:

hof8231 wrote:

super_mario90 wrote:

s0liddy wrote:

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=0&statisticCategory=RECEIVING&conference=null&season=2009&seasonType=REG&d-447263-s=RECEIVING_YARDS&d-447263-o=2&d-447263-n=1

M. Austin, 3rd in receiving yards, 20 more catches than D Jack.

M. Austin, longest was 60 yards for a TD, D Jack 71 yards for a TD

Catches
for 40 yards+: D Jack has 10, A Johnson has 9, M Austin has 8. Oh Wes
Welker has only 3 catches for 40+ yards, ya hes nothing special.V
Jackson, 4 catches for 40+, hes nothing special and definitely not a
deep threat. S Holmes 3 catches for 40+, hes garbage. Reggie Wayne 1
catch for 40+, WOW HORRIBLE.

Larry Fitzgerald's longest catch was 34 yards, HAHAHHA, wow he's nothing special, hes definitely not a deep threat.

shhhhhhhhhh football kiddies"

Now you wanna talk about "shhhhhhhhhh football kiddies

"

1st off to say wes welker,v.jackson,s.holmes,reggie wayne,larry fitzgeraldare all horrible,terrible,and aren't deep threats makes no sense.

the names that are highlighted are all deep threats.

Just
because those guys didn't have many deep plays all season long don't
mean their not deep threats they are already proven to be some of the
most DYNAMIC players going down the feild because those wr's didn't
have as many plays down the feild like they should've don't mean you
can say "oh they ain't a deep threat" you can't take that away from
them.

and miles austin 40 yard plays came from little short
receptions and he just ran after the catch getting more yards then what
the original pass was that doesn't make him a deep threat it's not like
austin caught all those 40 yard plays 40 yards deep like DRE did (cough
cough ).

moral of the story MILES AUSTIN AIN'T A DEEP THREAT.

He was being sarcastic fucknut. He was making fun of you.

I don't even know why I am here discussing football with some of these neanderthals lol. This is pathetic...

And you are referring to whom may I ask?

hof8231 wrote:

super_mario90 wrote:

^^^^i know he was being sarcastic but in a way i felt that he was being serious cause he's a dumb b*tch! for thinking miles austin is some kind of deep threat.

MILES AUSTIN DON'T EVEN GO DEEP.

(when my letters are all capitalized that doesn't mean im shouting)

OH, BUT HE DOES. WHAT'S "GOING TO DEEP" TO YOU? CUZ TO ME GOING DEEP IS ANYTIME YOU RUN 30+ YARDS DOWN THE FIELD BEFORE YOU CATCH THE BALL, WHICH AUSTIN DOES QUITE OFTEN.

(when my letters are all caps it means you're wrong/dumb.)

s0liddy wrote:

hof8231 wrote:

super_mario90 wrote:

s0liddy wrote:

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=0&statisticCategory=RECEIVING&conference=null&season=2009&seasonType=REG&d-447263-s=RECEIVING_YARDS&d-447263-o=2&d-447263-n=1

M. Austin, 3rd in receiving yards, 20 more catches than D Jack.

M. Austin, longest was 60 yards for a TD, D Jack 71 yards for a TD

Catches
for 40 yards+: D Jack has 10, A Johnson has 9, M Austin has 8. Oh Wes
Welker has only 3 catches for 40+ yards, ya hes nothing special.V
Jackson, 4 catches for 40+, hes nothing special and definitely not a
deep threat. S Holmes 3 catches for 40+, hes garbage. Reggie Wayne 1
catch for 40+, WOW HORRIBLE.

Larry Fitzgerald's longest catch was 34 yards, HAHAHHA, wow he's nothing special, hes definitely not a deep threat.

shhhhhhhhhh football kiddies"

Now you wanna talk about "shhhhhhhhhh football kiddies

"

1st off to say wes welker,v.jackson,s.holmes,reggie wayne,larry fitzgeraldare all horrible,terrible,and aren't deep threats makes no sense.

the names that are highlighted are all deep threats.

Just
because those guys didn't have many deep plays all season long don't
mean their not deep threats they are already proven to be some of the
most DYNAMIC players going down the feild because those wr's didn't
have as many plays down the feild like they should've don't mean you
can say "oh they ain't a deep threat" you can't take that away from
them.

and miles austin 40 yard plays came from little short
receptions and he just ran after the catch getting more yards then what
the original pass was that doesn't make him a deep threat it's not like
austin caught all those 40 yard plays 40 yards deep like DRE did (cough
cough ).

moral of the story MILES AUSTIN AIN'T A DEEP THREAT.

He was being sarcastic fucknut. He was making fun of you.

I don't even know why I am here discussing football with some of these neanderthals lol. This is pathetic...

And you are referring to whom may I ask?

The people that hate on Miles Austin and other Cowboys because they are Dallas Cowboys lol. It's like me hating on McNabb or D Jack calling them nothing, or worthless because they are Eagles and they haven't won a Superbowl... it's like uhhh ok

Jackson any day!