Ketcham While They're Hot Exclusive Member
Number of posts : 1199 Registration date : 2008-11-21
| Subject: Re: lol pat bowlen u fool 2009-10-23, 17:15 | |
| - 2ToN ThE EAFL KiLLa wrote:
- ur right don i had the years mixed up with the raiders and the tuck tule i thought the tuck rule was in 2002 but oak was in sb that year that game was year before geesh my bad no need 2 be a douche about it
and its pretty clear that even tho ur 'older' doesnt mean ur 'wisedom' or lack thereof is > anyone elses...
the fact of the mnatter is if the record doesnt matter then the plkayoffs dont matter since without a record u cant get in the playoffs....plain and simple....what dont u get about that? i mean most playoff teams have a .500 record or better....thats what gets em in the playoffs!!!!
when ur team wins u cheer....when they lose u boo em....then cheer for em and say 'WELL THEY HAD A CHANCE WE'LL BOUNCE BACK MAN WE TUFF WE TUFF' then u see al davis draft a SS in the 3rd round which no1 had heard of and was prolly be undrafted....oh sorry i was going off topic there....
needless to say theres no need to be a douche just because not every1 shares ur same viewpoints....but i think we all can agree on one thing....
17-0 > all!!!!!!
naw....the idea that u cant win the SB without making the playoffs...and u cant make the playoffs without finishing with a good record that GETS yu in the damn playoffs....
and it wasnt an attack on u...if u took it that way... Finally, a post in this thread that makes sense. Imagine that. | |
|
2ToN Moderator
Number of posts : 1147 Registration date : 2009-07-22
| Subject: Re: lol pat bowlen u fool 2009-10-23, 21:46 | |
| - THiZzLeWiZzLe wrote:
- spellcheck ton sheesh an fins suck goooooooooooooooooo raiders
dont make me get yukmouth and slap ya! | |
|