Eagles Offense

xXsKaTeR wrote:

LiL MooReR wrote:

You have speed, but McNabb = horrible.

McNabb and Horrible doesn't go into the same sentence. Maybe Russell and Horrible, but McNabb has the swagger of a winner.

he didnt have the swagger in the one superbowl he played in... haha dont say he has the swagger of a winner cuz he doesnt!!!!!!!!!!!!! he has the swagger of an 20 year old kid trying to win a game vs fresno state... haha if u have any talent or swagger its over, he has talent but his swag???????????????????? not quite enough cuz he is the next jim kelly except he wont go 4 years in a row!!!!!

from one "Bird" fan to another....the Eagles should do well this upcoming season.

Maclin isnt going to be good... he cant run routes and is injury prone. You guys already have 2 kick off specialist, so he wont do much.

why dnt we talk about a real offense... like ATL

um atl has a real offense? LMFAO yeah right,

i think the eagles will dominate because there team looks overall really good and with maclin and mcoy added our offence should be good but lets just hope mcnabb doesnt choke in the nfc championship game again

xXsKaTeR wrote:

Elite wrote:

lol, that was a bad comparison. Romo is still young, but wont come close to what Mcnab accomplished.

Im not going to say hes a bad qb, but his better days are clearly behind him. Hes really going to be the deciding factor in there season. that team is strong in a lott of areas, and i personally think qb is there weakest spot. Mcnabb in his prime, would take this team to the superbowl.

I really don't mean to be a dick, but are you retarded? McNabb played SPECTACULAR this season. What was it, 7 TD, 2 INT in post season? Most passing yards he's ever had except the 2004 season? This is just ridiculous and must be you being biased. McNabb looked like his young form this year..Absolutely destroying. He could not be sacked in the pocket the second half of the season. I felt like I was having deja vu of 2003 and 2004 where he was breaking 4-5 tackles regularly a game in the pocket.

It's unreal what some people say.

not trying to be funny, were you drunk when you wrote this? where are you getting 7td and 2 ints from? try 5 TDs and 4 INTs, no to mention he threw 3 TDs against the 22nd ranked cardinals pass defense. Whats so SPECTACULAR?

Its great he can move again, but its not the legs he should be worried about. Ive never seen someone throw so many absurd throws. I guess i must have missed all his SPECTACULAR performances, seeing as i didnt watch him play teams like Seahawks, Browns, Rams, or 49ers.

Against teams with above avg. defenses that he faced, Bal, Pitts, Dal 2x, NYG 2x, WAS 2x(if you consider Was a good defence in the midst of there huge game losing streak, or dallas a good defense at all) He reached 200 yards ONLY TWICE IN 8 GAMES, Whats so SPECTACULAR?

its absurd what some people say. Its ridiculous to think hes even close to what he once was. He nearly missed the playoffs with that team.

woah buddy your a dumb ass cards D was amazing in post season execpt in super bowl.

iTz DiFiiCuLT wrote:

woah buddy your a dumb ass cards D was amazing in post season execpt in super bowl.

what are you talking about? I understand in the superbowl, and against mcnabb, they did did not play well. I know iTz DiFiiCuLT for some, but ill try to explain it.

They played a solid game, far from amazing, against ATL. They took advantage of a young qb, in arizona. On the road there defense once again sucked. I hope your not saying there great from that one performance against the
Pathers? Good defenses dont force 5 INTS, bad QBs who choke throw 5 INTS.

anyway, you believe they were amazing in the playoffs, right? so in the regular season, they werent good, right? Regular season yards allowed per play? 5.3. Post season yards allowed per play? 5.2. or put it this way. One of the best offenses in football put up 80 points in the playoffs. They allowed 78. Do you understand how absurd it was that they were almost outscored? It was the same defense that was ranked 28th in points allowed during the regular season..

--
and i apperciate, that out of the whole post, you found 1 thing u didnt agree with. thank you.

Look at the cards D in the reg season and look at the cards D in post season WAYYY better

Elite wrote:

iTz DiFiiCuLT wrote:

woah buddy your a dumb ass cards D was amazing in post season execpt in super bowl.

what are you talking about? I understand in the superbowl, and against mcnabb, they did did not play well. I know iTz DiFiiCuLT for some, but ill try to explain it.

They played a solid game, far from amazing, against ATL. They took advantage of a young qb, in arizona. On the road there defense once again sucked. I hope your not saying there great from that one performance against the
Pathers? Good defenses dont force 5 INTS, bad QBs who choke throw 5 INTS.

anyway, you believe they were amazing in the playoffs, right? so in the regular season, they werent good, right? Regular season yards allowed per play? 5.3. Post season yards allowed per play? 5.2. or put it this way. One of the best offenses in football put up 80 points in the playoffs. They allowed 78. Do you understand how absurd it was that they were almost outscored? It was the same defense that was ranked 28th in points allowed during the regular season..

--
and i apperciate, that out of the whole post, you found 1 thing u didnt agree with. thank you.

Yeah i get your point on stats they might not look that great but lets face it... Arizona D really stepped up in the playoffs... they completely shutdown turner and westbrook... they forced alot of turnovers and made a stop when it really mattered... (except superbowl) IMO cards were playing their best football for a long long time in the playoffs and definetly deserved to go to the superbowl not just because of their offense but their defense aswell.