West Coast or Seattle?

Which offensive playbook do you think is better? I know a lot of you will most likely say Seattle just because the West Coast playbook does not have any shotgun formations, but I'm more focused on the Far and Near formations.

I like the near and far plays better out of the seattle playbook, but they are both decent and the west coast offense pb gets overlooked a lot. I have looked at them both and i decided to go with seattle pb earlier in the season, and i am a guy who rarely uses shotgun.

I think I might have to go with Seattle. My plan was to start playing under center more but I can't be without shotgun if someone starts bringing heat. Gun Snugs Flip is in Seattle which is a bonus.

I used both books but Sea always just is a good fit for my team.

I will prolly go with west coast they have good running formations and i love to run the ball all day

I use TB

ELeiser17 wrote:

I think I might have to go with Seattle. My plan was to start playing under center more but I can't be without shotgun if someone starts bringing heat. Gun Snugs Flip is in Seattle which is a bonus.

sup Eleiser17? i think that i saw you posting on VG in the West Coast section. i responded there on this topic a while back. personally, i use the Ravens and i love the West Coast playbook over the SEA. however, like you said here...maybe the SEA maybe a better fit because i could come out from under center at any time. and yes...i to love the Near and Far formations as well.

P.S. you need to swing by the "Introduce Yourself" thread so that our member here in MS can get more familiar with you. and....what types of plays do you set as your audbiles for the WCO or SEA playbooks?

ELeiser17 wrote:

Which offensive playbook do you think is better? I know a lot of you will most likely say Seattle just because the West Coast playbook does not have any shotgun formations, but I'm more focused on the Far and Near formations.

if u gunna use the west coast u gunna have to have a mobile qb

use a lot of screens and stuff out of the single back

and also get the no huddle near write up in the offense section

both playbooks r nice ... only think one has no shotgun n other does

Seattle is a good running playbook with the near and far formations, but the Singleback: Ace Twins is the best formation IMO.

i think everybody should at least have one gun formation in their PB so i have to go with seattle

LiL MooReR wrote:

Seattle is a good running playbook with the near and far formations, but the Singleback: Ace Twins is the best formation IMO.

SEA pb doesn't have many screen plays in it does it?

Militant X 1 wrote:

LiL MooReR wrote:

Seattle is a good running playbook with the near and far formations, but the Singleback: Ace Twins is the best formation IMO.

SEA pb doesn't have many screen plays in it does it?

It has a few i think mostly hb screens.