| Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub | |
|
+10Big Hungry 702 s0liddy iGotBeast$wag13 KODOUBLE24 FelixdaCat Hormel super_mario90 hof8231 Sun CapnCrunch 14 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
CapnCrunch Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 818 Registration date : 2009-09-23
| Subject: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-11-30, 05:45 | |
| Tony Romo = 3 turnovers in 1/2 a season
Matt Schaub = 3 turnovers in 1/2 a game | |
|
| |
Sun All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 329 Registration date : 2009-09-18
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-11-30, 08:56 | |
| Tony Romo = 17 TDs
Matt Schaub = 21 TDs | |
|
| |
hof8231 Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 550 Registration date : 2008-12-27
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-11-30, 12:30 | |
| Tony Romo = 8 wins
Matt Shaub = 5 wins
Tony Romo= 17 TDs/7 INTs
Matt Shaub= 21 TDs/11 INTs
And Matt Shaub has thrown 48 more pass attempts than Romo for only 309 more yards | |
|
| |
super_mario90 Legend MS Member
Number of posts : 2188 Registration date : 2009-08-19
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-11-30, 14:45 | |
| personally i think romo is a little better but schaub just needs to take care of the football more that pick 6 he threw on sunday was intended to rookie TE james casey (bad route ran) if that was O.D. that would've been a completion.
but schaubs #'s are better than romos and romo don't have enough weapons to throw to like schaub and schaub is on a passing offence romo is on a running offence.
plus schaub has a deep threat (DRE)
romo doesn't have a deep threat (?) | |
|
| |
hof8231 Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 550 Registration date : 2008-12-27
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-11-30, 15:06 | |
| - super_mario90 wrote:
- personally i think romo is a little better but schaub just needs to take care of the football more that pick 6 he threw on sunday was intended to rookie TE james casey (bad route ran) if that was O.D. that would've been a completion.
but schaubs #'s are better than romos and romo don't have enough weapons to throw to like schaub and schaub is on a passing offence romo is on a running offence.
plus schaub has a deep threat (DRE)
romo doesn't have a deep threat (?) I was soooo waiting for you to say this. Austin has 3 more 20+ yard receptions than Dre and 1 more 40+ yard play, not to mention he averages 4.6 more yards per catch than Johnson. And in the category that really matters, Austin has 3 more TDs than Johnson. Say what you will, but Miles Austin is having a better season than Andre Johnson. | |
|
| |
Hormel Exclusive Member
Number of posts : 413 Registration date : 2008-12-25
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-11-30, 17:02 | |
| - hof8231 wrote:
- super_mario90 wrote:
- personally i think romo is a little better but schaub just needs to take care of the football more that pick 6 he threw on sunday was intended to rookie TE james casey (bad route ran) if that was O.D. that would've been a completion.
but schaubs #'s are better than romos and romo don't have enough weapons to throw to like schaub and schaub is on a passing offence romo is on a running offence.
plus schaub has a deep threat (DRE)
romo doesn't have a deep threat (?) I was soooo waiting for you to say this. Austin has 3 more 20+ yard receptions than Dre and 1 more 40+ yard play, not to mention he averages 4.6 more yards per catch than Johnson. And in the category that really matters, Austin has 3 more TDs than Johnson. Say what you will, but Miles Austin is having a better season than Andre Johnson. My Miles Austin jersey was well worth the money, time to to put that Owens one in my dont wear sectoin, along with my Keyshawn | |
|
| |
super_mario90 Legend MS Member
Number of posts : 2188 Registration date : 2009-08-19
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-11-30, 18:29 | |
| The reason why miles has certain stats better than dre is because defences don't care about austin he don't even get doubled covered where was he against the packers he got played man to man most of that game and where was he against the skins he also in that game got covered man to man for most of that game.
FACT: miles just plays good against bad defences but he doesn't show up to play against good defences.
And miles austin could have all the receiving stats in the world and he will still not be as good as dre or anything close to him,miles ain't even considered a DEEP THREAT! he can't beat someone on the outside.
miles would never be an elite wr and is not having a better season than dre if dre can get back to #1 on the receiving yds list he can become the second wr in nfl history to lead the nfl in receiving yds for two straight seasons the only wr to do that was jerry rice. | |
|
| |
FelixdaCat New MS Member
Number of posts : 88 Registration date : 2008-09-18
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-11-30, 18:53 | |
| - super_mario90 wrote:
but schaubs #'s are better than romos and romo don't have enough weapons to throw to like schaub and schaub is on a passing offence romo is on a running offence.
plus schaub has a deep threat (DRE)
romo doesn't have a deep threat (?) Man, as soon as you said that you LOST this argument. Romo's and Schaub's numbers are nearly identical, so the fact that you say Romo has LESS weapons to throw to just shows that Romo is better than Schaub. Romo is doing just as much (and probably more cause he has more wins) with less talent around him according to you. Sorry mario but you dug yourself into a hole on that one. P.S. and I can't believe I, an Eagles fan, is arguing in favor of Tony Romo. lol. | |
|
| |
super_mario90 Legend MS Member
Number of posts : 2188 Registration date : 2009-08-19
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-11-30, 22:48 | |
| - FelixdaCat wrote:
- super_mario90 wrote:
but schaubs #'s are better than romos and romo don't have enough weapons to throw to like schaub and schaub is on a passing offence romo is on a running offence.
plus schaub has a deep threat (DRE)
romo doesn't have a deep threat (?) Man, as soon as you said that you LOST this argument. Romo's and Schaub's numbers are nearly identical, so the fact that you say Romo has LESS weapons to throw to just shows that Romo is better than Schaub. Romo is doing just as much (and probably more cause he has more wins) with less talent around him according to you.
Sorry mario but you dug yourself into a hole on that one.
P.S. and I can't believe I, an Eagles fan, is arguing in favor of Tony Romo. lol. "the fact that you say Romo has LESS weapons to throw to just shows that Romo is better than Schaub" i never said schaub was better than romo i said he got better #'s than homo i mean romo. and their numbers arn't identical schaub ranked #2 in passing yds 3,242 romo ranked #6 in passing yds 2,933 i'll put up more stats later | |
|
| |
CapnCrunch Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 818 Registration date : 2009-09-23
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-11-30, 23:08 | |
| - super_mario90 wrote:
- lead the nfl in receiving yds for two straight seasons the only wr to do that was jerry rice.
Wrong again, Hot Shot Don Hutson - 1937, 1938, 1939 and again in 1941, 42, 43 and 44 | |
|
| |
hof8231 Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 550 Registration date : 2008-12-27
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-12-01, 00:51 | |
| - super_mario90 wrote:
- FelixdaCat wrote:
- super_mario90 wrote:
but schaubs #'s are better than romos and romo don't have enough weapons to throw to like schaub and schaub is on a passing offence romo is on a running offence.
plus schaub has a deep threat (DRE)
romo doesn't have a deep threat (?) Man, as soon as you said that you LOST this argument. Romo's and Schaub's numbers are nearly identical, so the fact that you say Romo has LESS weapons to throw to just shows that Romo is better than Schaub. Romo is doing just as much (and probably more cause he has more wins) with less talent around him according to you.
Sorry mario but you dug yourself into a hole on that one.
P.S. and I can't believe I, an Eagles fan, is arguing in favor of Tony Romo. lol. "the fact that you say Romo has LESS weapons to throw to just shows that Romo is better than Schaub"
i never said schaub was better than romo i said he got better #'s than homo i mean romo.
and their numbers arn't identical
schaub ranked #2 in passing yds 3,242 romo ranked #6 in passing yds 2,933
i'll put up more stats later Go ahead, post up more stats. I'll put the two up that matter. Romo TD/INT ratio: 17-7=over 2 TDs per interception Schcrub TD/INT ration: 21=11=under 2 TDs per interception Romo: 8 wins Schrub: 5 wins Schcrub only has more yards because he has more passing attempts, which is mainly due to the fact that The Texans have a piss poor running game. | |
|
| |
hof8231 Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 550 Registration date : 2008-12-27
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-12-01, 01:09 | |
| - super_mario90 wrote:
- he can become the second wr in nfl history to lead the nfl in receiving yds for two straight seasons the only wr to do that was jerry rice.
False. Bobby Mitchell, Raymond Berry, Mal Kutner and Don Houston have also done it. Wrong again. | |
|
| |
super_mario90 Legend MS Member
Number of posts : 2188 Registration date : 2009-08-19
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-12-01, 01:13 | |
| since you guys have alot of time on your hands can you look up the last wr to do that i think it would be jerry rice.
and the boys have a piss poor throwing game ya'll only throw good against bad defences thats a shame.
SMH | |
|
| |
super_mario90 Legend MS Member
Number of posts : 2188 Registration date : 2009-08-19
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-12-01, 01:19 | |
| lol never heard of them wr's | |
|
| |
hof8231 Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 550 Registration date : 2008-12-27
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-12-01, 01:40 | |
| - super_mario90 wrote:
- lol never heard of them wr's
That's a shame. Maybe if you knew anything about football you would know them. And Romo was able to throw pretty well on the Eagles, and what good defenses has Schcrub thrown on? | |
|
| |
super_mario90 Legend MS Member
Number of posts : 2188 Registration date : 2009-08-19
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-12-01, 04:34 | |
| the reason tony homo threw so well against the eagles was because they had a couple of injured starters on defence.
schaub's thrown on some not to good defences but they're better than the ones tony homo threw against.
and you don't know those wr's either you just read about them when you googled about who has lead the nfl in receiving yds in two straight seasons.
SO STFU OR GTFO | |
|
| |
KODOUBLE24 Rookie MS Member
Number of posts : 150 Registration date : 2009-08-27
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-12-01, 07:40 | |
| The TEAXANSsuck dick who really cares. | |
|
| |
Sun All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 329 Registration date : 2009-09-18
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-12-01, 19:12 | |
| - KODOUBLE24 wrote:
- The TEAXANSsuck dick who really cares.
Wow, that has to be the best argument ever. | |
|
| |
iGotBeast$wag13 Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 533 Registration date : 2009-09-04
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-12-01, 21:23 | |
| - CapnCrunch wrote:
- super_mario90 wrote:
- lead the nfl in receiving yds for two straight seasons the only wr to do that was jerry rice.
Wrong again, Hot Shot
Don Hutson - 1937, 1938, 1939 and again in 1941, 42, 43 and 44 No mario is right on this one. AJ Da Beast Man happens to be my fav player and imma a lil biast but i heard CBS or ESPN say that statment | |
|
| |
CapnCrunch Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 818 Registration date : 2009-09-23
| Subject: Yes 2009-12-02, 11:03 | |
| - OB_DA_BEAST_MAN wrote:
- ...........
Don Hutson - 1937, 1938, 1939 and again in 1941, 42, 43 and 44 but i heard CBS or ESPN say that statment[/quote]. Yes and right after they said it many people came out to refute it and here is why Baseball history goes back over a hundred years, mergers, world series etc... didn't stop them from keeping the old stats Hockey same thing, history goes back to before the Cup But Football, the Superbowl comes around and everyone wants to throw out all the history before 1960. | |
|
| |
super_mario90 Legend MS Member
Number of posts : 2188 Registration date : 2009-08-19
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-12-02, 17:11 | |
| nobody care's about what happen in football before 1960.
this day and age is the best football ever players today are not even human compared to them old timers LOL | |
|
| |
hof8231 Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 550 Registration date : 2008-12-27
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-12-02, 17:38 | |
| - super_mario90 wrote:
- nobody care's about what happen in football before 1960.
this day and age is the best football ever players today are not even human compared to them old timers LOL You are so fucking ignorant it's not even funny. | |
|
| |
s0liddy All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 350 Registration date : 2009-09-03
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-12-02, 18:44 | |
| lol mario, you're a good troll man, keep it up....
at least I hope you're trolling, if not I would guess you're 13-17 yrs old. | |
|
| |
Big Hungry 702 Madden School Veteran
Number of posts : 1459 Registration date : 2009-07-25
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-12-02, 19:31 | |
| wow...mario. football back then was the s***. not this pansy ass bullshit they play now-adays, where you cant touch the qb with out a penalty | |
|
| |
jsmall28 Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 614 Registration date : 2009-08-15
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub 2009-12-02, 21:16 | |
| lol mario. how can you say that the old football players aren't men compared to today? if you go back far enough, they didnt even wear real helmets! just leather caps. after that, it wasn't that much safer. the hits that were allowed then would result in a suspension today. the game has been softened up, but for good reasons (the players health). the game before was much rougher than today's game, though. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub | |
| |
|
| |
| Tony Romo is better than Matt Schaub | |
|