| Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? | |
|
+4macdaddy so much swag W A V Y D R E onefive 8 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
onefive New MS Member
Number of posts : 53 Registration date : 2009-09-22
| Subject: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-09, 22:23 | |
| this has been my debate. which one of these is the best? im going with Far Tight Twins but there is so much out of i form pro that i dnt wanna keep my mind on far tight.
i kno ppl have schemes outta of both of these but with one can be more successful? | |
|
| |
W A V Y D R E Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 824 Registration date : 2008-12-30
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-09, 23:20 | |
| | |
|
| |
so much swag Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1839 Registration date : 2009-08-09
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-09, 23:39 | |
| my advice.....run them both!!!!!! why kill with a gun !!!!!when you can adambomb they a$$$....think about it.......1 | |
|
| |
macdaddy New MS Member
Number of posts : 86 Registration date : 2008-03-06
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-10, 14:54 | |
| if I could find a playbook that had both formations..... I would. Since I can't, I go with Far Tight. | |
|
| |
TheDon270 Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 666 Registration date : 2009-06-18
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-10, 15:27 | |
| i'm a west coast offensive guy, so i say far tight twins. | |
|
| |
MiamiXCanes Madden Writers
Number of posts : 1661 Registration date : 2009-09-14
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-10, 16:20 | |
| Far tight twins all the way | |
|
| |
Sun All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 329 Registration date : 2009-09-18
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-10, 16:44 | |
| - macdaddy wrote:
- if I could find a playbook that had both formations..... I would. Since I can't, I go with Far Tight.
The Seattle playbook has Far Tight Twins and I-Form Pro Twins. I would also go with both. Far Tight Twins is a very basic scheme; extremely effective but easily countered. However, if you mix in I-Form Pro Twins, the opponent won't be able to focus on your FTT. The other alternative is to go with the West Coast playbook and mix Far Tight Twins with Near Pro and Far Pro. Near Pro has a quick toss that works like the FTT's Quick Toss. | |
|
| |
MiamiXCanes Madden Writers
Number of posts : 1661 Registration date : 2009-09-14
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-10, 16:46 | |
| near pro toss isnt in the west coast PB | |
|
| |
onefive New MS Member
Number of posts : 53 Registration date : 2009-09-22
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-10, 17:34 | |
| seattle has both?? but does seattle have good Shotgun formations? | |
|
| |
onefive New MS Member
Number of posts : 53 Registration date : 2009-09-22
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-10, 17:47 | |
| seattle playbook i think has the best formations in the game. they just lack gun bunch but u can run the same thing from singleback. this playbook has more of a power run game to it. in my mind this is the best playbook in the game. seattle seahawks
far pro far tight twins gun doubles gun doubles wk gun empty trey gun snugs flip gun split slot gun spread wk i form pro i form pro twins i form slot i form tight i form tight pr singleback ace singleback ace twins singleback bunch swap singleback doubles singleback flex singleback spread singleback tight doubles singleback y trips split pro split pro slot | |
|
| |
Militant X 1 Madden School Veteran
Number of posts : 2436 Registration date : 2008-11-19
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-10, 18:03 | |
| - Sun wrote:
-
I would also go with both. Far Tight Twins is a very basic scheme; extremely effective but easily countered. However, if you mix in I-Form Pro Twins, the opponent won't be able to focus on your FTT.
The other alternative is to go with the West Coast playbook and mix Far Tight Twins with Near Pro and Far Pro. Near Pro has a quick toss that works like the FTT's Quick Toss. Far Tight Twins is a beast!!! it is only "easily" countered cause most cats just run the same 2 plays.... Flats and Quick Toss....over and over again! not me!!! i open up that formation and i am busting your tail with the other plays as well such as.... Bench Switch, Curls, FB Dive, HB Counter, HB Sweep, Mesh, Slant Hook, X Spot, Slot Corner (one of my favs), and the PA Waggle. i keep you guessing, looking and chasing! lol! you can't find me (get a read on me) in this formation cause i am all over! lol! | |
|
| |
onefive New MS Member
Number of posts : 53 Registration date : 2009-09-22
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-10, 18:11 | |
| so do u prefer Seattle, Houston, or West Coast Playbooks??? | |
|
| |
Militant X 1 Madden School Veteran
Number of posts : 2436 Registration date : 2008-11-19
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-10, 18:30 | |
| - onefive wrote:
- so do u prefer Seattle, Houston, or West Coast Playbooks???
One5....i prefer the West Coast pb. here is why: -although the Far Tight Twins is in the SEA pb....it (SEA pb) is missing the Near Pro. i have a few nice plays out of that formation. SEA pb also doesn't have the Weak Flex Twins formation in it. this is actually a nice formation to run and pass out of as well. | |
|
| |
Sun All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 329 Registration date : 2009-09-18
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-10, 18:35 | |
| - crazyblack001 wrote:
- near pro toss isnt in the west coast PB
My bad, it's in San Francisco's playbook, which doesn't have Far Tight Twins. - Militant X 1 wrote:
- Far Tight Twins is a beast!!! it is only "easily" countered cause most cats just run the same 2 plays....Flats and Quick Toss....over and over again! not me!!!
i open up that formation and i am busting your tail with the other plays as well such as....Bench Switch, Curls, FB Dive, HB Counter, HB Sweep, Mesh, Slant Hook, X Spot, Slot Corner (one of my favs), and the PA Waggle. i keep you guessing, looking and chasing! lol! you can't find me (get a read on me) in this formation cause i am all over! lol! I wasn't clear in my post then. I meant it was easily countered because people don't build around this, they just take what's given free. Obviously, if you dig deep, it can be a dangerous formation. | |
|
| |
onefive New MS Member
Number of posts : 53 Registration date : 2009-09-22
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-10, 18:42 | |
| i understand now. i am researching this and it has come down to west coast and houston. but i then looked into Washingtons Playbook. they have the near toss and it is pretty nice but still not the same as west coast far tight twins. but i do see now WEST COAST ALL THE WAY!!!! if i am having a lack of success from this playbook then i will go to houston but i doubt i will ever have lack of success from this book. Gun Bunch is a formation i have to have. | |
|
| |
so much swag Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1839 Registration date : 2009-08-09
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? 2009-11-11, 11:04 | |
| one five..go with sea..pbook...it's fire!!!!!!!!!!!!! i just keep finding scheme ,,,,,scheme,,,,scheme...on damn near everything....go with it...trust. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? | |
| |
|
| |
| Far Tight Twins or I-Form Pro Twins? | |
|