| PAC-10 TALK | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Big Hungry 702 Madden School Veteran
Number of posts : 1459 Registration date : 2009-07-25
| Subject: PAC-10 TALK 2009-09-14, 11:04 | |
| If your a fan of the PAC-10 this is the place to talk, let it ring. wether it be for football or basketball, if you something to say about the PAC-10 this is the place. | |
|
| |
Big Hungry 702 Madden School Veteran
Number of posts : 1459 Registration date : 2009-07-25
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-09-19, 19:00 | |
| AND SC GOES DOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHA **** U SC. GO HUSKIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | |
|
| |
TheDon270 Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 666 Registration date : 2009-06-18
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-09-19, 19:38 | |
| big hungry: did you watch the game at all? i'm just curious...i don't care if u.s.c. got beat...how is u.s.c. supposed to win if they keep turning over the ball? they had 3 turnovers, and not to mention, barkley and taylor mays didn't play...hell, it could of happened to anybody else besides u.s.c...with that being said i'm not surprised about them losing....if you notice u.s.c. they beat the good teams, and they lose to lesser teams they were supposed to beat. same stuff, different year. | |
|
| |
Big Hungry 702 Madden School Veteran
Number of posts : 1459 Registration date : 2009-07-25
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-09-19, 20:31 | |
| yea i wathed the game, washington outplayed them on both sides of the ball.sc has a trend to lose to lesser teams, and i know that, if sc doesnt right the ship they could lose more than 2games this year | |
|
| |
TheDon270 Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 666 Registration date : 2009-06-18
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-09-19, 20:41 | |
| I couldn't say they outplayed u.s.c....the turnovers were the key.....other then that I think still have better total offensive yards.....but again the 3 turnovers were the deciding factor. | |
|
| |
Big Hungry 702 Madden School Veteran
Number of posts : 1459 Registration date : 2009-07-25
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-09-19, 21:17 | |
| i can honestly see sc losing 2-3 games this year | |
|
| |
TheDon270 Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 666 Registration date : 2009-06-18
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-09-19, 21:29 | |
| Its possible...we'll see how the season plays out. | |
|
| |
Big Hungry 702 Madden School Veteran
Number of posts : 1459 Registration date : 2009-07-25
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-09-19, 21:35 | |
| yea, im really surprised by washington though locker is fuckinn sweet | |
|
| |
Fudgy Moderator
Number of posts : 4368 Registration date : 2008-03-12
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-09-19, 21:42 | |
| im a HUUUUGGEEE CAL fan
jahvid tore it up today | |
|
| |
Big Hungry 702 Madden School Veteran
Number of posts : 1459 Registration date : 2009-07-25
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-09-19, 21:49 | |
| yea he did. 5 td's? HEISMAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | |
|
| |
Fudgy Moderator
Number of posts : 4368 Registration date : 2008-03-12
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-09-20, 12:37 | |
| - BIG HUNGRY 702 wrote:
- yea he did. 5 td's? HEISMAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
with the first pick in the 2010 nfl draft, ___________ selects jahvid best! | |
|
| |
GRIDIRONxGURU Rookie MS Member
Number of posts : 125 Registration date : 2008-09-17
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-09-20, 14:56 | |
| - TheDon270 wrote:
- I couldn't say they outplayed u. s. c....the turnovers were the key.....other then that I think still have better total offensive yards.....but again the 3 turnovers were the deciding factor.
FYI: forcing turnovers... is out-playing another team... just in case you never grasped that before... i can see UCLA OSU UO all 3 beating u.s.c. if they dont straighten up... eek @ that train wreck... was like driving by a car accident i just... couldnt... stop... looking... at... all... (and laughing at the same time) anyways... the qbove quoted statement is HILARIOUS and not very well thought through... "E" | |
|
| |
GRIDIRONxGURU Rookie MS Member
Number of posts : 125 Registration date : 2008-09-17
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-09-20, 14:59 | |
| oh and by the way... a 67 yard difference in total yards... isnt that big of a margin... and 0-10 on 3rd downs... are you FREAKING KIDDING ME????????
at least when my teams lose... i dont make excuses for them...
lol... they should have played the SEC kid... Mustain...
"E" | |
|
| |
Big Hungry 702 Madden School Veteran
Number of posts : 1459 Registration date : 2009-07-25
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-09-20, 15:51 | |
| very well said, corp is a shitty qb, and at least mustain HAS staring experience, corp is a joke | |
|
| |
Big Hungry 702 Madden School Veteran
Number of posts : 1459 Registration date : 2009-07-25
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-10-02, 21:34 | |
| Blount is possibly coming back........ | |
|
| |
Fudgy Moderator
Number of posts : 4368 Registration date : 2008-03-12
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-10-05, 00:44 | |
| ok cal is fucking pissing me off now
we are most likely unranked now
this is bulllllllllshhiiiiiiiiitttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt | |
|
| |
Big Hungry 702 Madden School Veteran
Number of posts : 1459 Registration date : 2009-07-25
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-10-05, 01:17 | |
| lol, i know what ze **** is wrong with cal? | |
|
| |
Devo Madden School Veteran
Number of posts : 1120 Registration date : 2009-02-28
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-11-26, 12:56 | |
| CAL BASKETBALL HOES............ | |
|
| |
Devo Madden School Veteran
Number of posts : 1120 Registration date : 2009-02-28
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-11-26, 15:34 | |
| oh yeah and cal football is bouncin back next year wit at least a tie for first in the pac-10 especially if jahvid best stays for his senior year. we'll have a few new receivers steppin up and our backfield will be murder wit vereen and best back there | |
|
| |
Fudgy Moderator
Number of posts : 4368 Registration date : 2008-03-12
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-12-22, 02:20 | |
| jahvid isn't playing in the poinsettia bowl. | |
|
| |
Fudgy Moderator
Number of posts : 4368 Registration date : 2008-03-12
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK 2009-12-25, 03:19 | |
| man, we got s*** on by utah | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: PAC-10 TALK | |
| |
|
| |
| PAC-10 TALK | |
|