| new team for online? | |
|
+6D_Cash -iBleedGreen- BOSTN BEANER [TRMG] xl23lx iMMoRTaL Crunk the madden guru 10 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
the madden guru New MS Member
Number of posts : 36 Registration date : 2008-03-06
| Subject: new team for online? 2009-02-03, 00:45 | |
| I have a nice looking record, 333-66, i am using the Cards that was before the new update, and before that i was using my Giants and the Chargers, I like to RC, becuse it takes skill, but i need a new team that wont make me feel like every other band wagon jumper using the Cards. i was feeling the 'Boys although no one would probably play me. any suggestions? THE MADDEN GURU | |
|
| |
Crunk Moderator
Number of posts : 2578 Registration date : 2008-03-10
| Subject: Re: new team for online? 2009-02-03, 00:54 | |
| I have been using the Packers lately, since they got a good D and a passing offense. | |
|
| |
[TRMG] xl23lx iMMoRTaL All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 299 Registration date : 2009-01-29
| Subject: Re: new team for online? 2009-02-03, 00:56 | |
| san diego is full of superstars, try em | |
|
| |
the madden guru New MS Member
Number of posts : 36 Registration date : 2008-03-06
| Subject: Re: new team for online? 2009-02-03, 01:00 | |
| - xl23lx iMMoRTaL wrote:
- san diego is full of superstars, try em
the chargers got killed in the update, VJ and chambers got lowered in one way or another and LT is now officially lil' LT again. so did Rivers a tiny bit. but the packers? i'll have to take a look at 'em. | |
|
| |
BOSTN BEANER Exclusive Member
Number of posts : 2328 Registration date : 2008-11-17
| Subject: Re: new team for online? 2009-02-03, 01:01 | |
| i been playin with atlanta and they are pretty good.. i dont RC though so i dont know if they would fit that style for u. | |
|
| |
[TRMG] xl23lx iMMoRTaL All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 299 Registration date : 2009-01-29
| Subject: Re: new team for online? 2009-02-03, 01:02 | |
| my bad i didnt see the chargers in the post, but the steelers are nice, they got the D and got the Sweed guy to Rc with, also the Jags | |
|
| |
-iBleedGreen- Exclusive Member
Number of posts : 460 Registration date : 2008-08-19
| Subject: Re: new team for online? 2009-02-03, 01:05 | |
| Well.. if you like to RC you could use KC, Dwayne Bowe is dirty.. and LJ is always a good option for running the ball. Also you have Arizona got a real good update. You could try them out. | |
|
| |
D_Cash Exclusive Member
Number of posts : 1075 Registration date : 2008-11-19
| Subject: Re: new team for online? 2009-02-03, 08:36 | |
| | |
|
| |
[TRMG] xl23lx iMMoRTaL All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 299 Registration date : 2009-01-29
| Subject: Re: new team for online? 2009-02-03, 11:20 | |
| the only problem is they dont hold on to it after they get the animation. when i rc i try to use cover ball, does that help bringing it in any better? | |
|
| |
NewbieX2 New MS Member
Number of posts : 93 Registration date : 2008-07-18
| Subject: Re: new team for online? 2009-02-03, 17:59 | |
| - xl23lx iMMoRTaL wrote:
- the only problem is they dont hold on to it after they get the animation. when i rc i try to use cover ball, does that help bringing it in any better?
Supposedly. I always do it. As soon as my receiver touches the ball I hold RB. | |
|
| |
tuki94 Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1265 Registration date : 2009-01-01
| Subject: Re: new team for online? 2009-02-03, 18:07 | |
| | |
|
| |
pkismyname Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1145 Registration date : 2008-12-27
| Subject: Re: new team for online? 2009-02-04, 00:09 | |
| Texans got the 3rd best WR in the game and have a decent offense and defense. | |
|
| |
KidProDiiGy All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 489 Registration date : 2008-12-01
| Subject: Re: new team for online? 2009-02-10, 01:05 | |
| i play with the cowboys because now u can rocket on either side solid running game mobile qb great defense and plus the person who ends all lives roy williams | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: new team for online? | |
| |
|
| |
| new team for online? | |
|