| ATL vs. NO | |
|
+11Ellard Link in a box Fudgy XXL NDG Crunk Bonez183 xXall-hail-MEGATRONXx Big Hungry 702 super_mario90 hof8231 PapaSmurf 15 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
super_mario90 Legend MS Member
Number of posts : 2188 Registration date : 2009-08-19
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-03, 00:37 | |
| "and TG is gonna be thrown to all day TG> Shockey."
lol and so will shockey cuz i see no one on that falcons D stoping shockey he's just as hard 2 cover as gonzo | |
|
| |
Ellard All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 390 Registration date : 2009-04-20
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-03, 00:51 | |
| You feel silly yet? You was so sure them "Dirty-Terds" was gon win and LOST! THAT SHITS HILARIOUS!
btw... notice how none of you "Dirty-Terd" fans are in the box! LOL!!!!!!!
"If you aint a Saints Fan, YOU AINT s***!" haha lol | |
|
| |
Big Hungry 702 Madden School Veteran
Number of posts : 1459 Registration date : 2009-07-25
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-03, 01:06 | |
| man i know we lost and everything im just glad we didnt get blown out. | |
|
| |
super_mario90 Legend MS Member
Number of posts : 2188 Registration date : 2009-08-19
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-03, 02:08 | |
| matt ryan played like sh*t 3 intro's (interceptions) | |
|
| |
hof8231 Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 550 Registration date : 2008-12-27
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-03, 02:09 | |
| Makes me feel better that the boys beat the Falcons considering the falcons were able to ball with the Saints lol. I stand corrected. I thought it'd be a blowout...not so much. | |
|
| |
PapaSmurf Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1088 Registration date : 2009-01-20
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-03, 06:59 | |
| idc care man.. we basically were the closest to beating the saints.. we only lost by 1 possesion.. i mean look at that drop by jenkins on 3rd n 4th.. which woulda set up 1st n goal.. then 2 fg misses by r kicker.... every thought iit would be like 14-45... n we came back down by 14 at half without ball... | |
|
| |
BOSTN BEANER Exclusive Member
Number of posts : 2328 Registration date : 2008-11-17
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-03, 07:15 | |
| - Falcon_Fan727 wrote:
- idc care man.. we basically were the closest to beating the saints.. we only lost by 1 possesion.. i mean look at that drop by jenkins on 3rd n 4th.. which woulda set up 1st n goal.. then 2 fg misses by r kicker.... every thought iit would be like 14-45... n we came back down by 14 at half without ball...
Close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. | |
|
| |
PapaSmurf Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1088 Registration date : 2009-01-20
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-03, 10:59 | |
| - BOSTN BEANER wrote:
- Falcon_Fan727 wrote:
- idc care man.. we basically were the closest to beating the saints.. we only lost by 1 possesion.. i mean look at that drop by jenkins on 3rd n 4th.. which woulda set up 1st n goal.. then 2 fg misses by r kicker.... every thought iit would be like 14-45... n we came back down by 14 at half without ball...
Close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. that is true.. im jus saying every1 was like saints would murder us.. but we suprised alot of peeps | |
|
| |
Ellard All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 390 Registration date : 2009-04-20
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-03, 11:14 | |
| YOU didnt surprise anybody lol | |
|
| |
CJDAWGG14 Administrator
Number of posts : 2937 Registration date : 2008-10-11
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-03, 11:14 | |
| lol, losing by 1 is the same thing as losing by 100. You still lost no matter how close anyone came or whatever, and Miami was the closest to beating the saints since they had like a 21 point lead on em. | |
|
| |
Ellard All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 390 Registration date : 2009-04-20
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-03, 11:26 | |
| i agree wit what cj and boston said they know whats up | |
|
| |
PapaSmurf Hall of Fame MS Member
Number of posts : 1088 Registration date : 2009-01-20
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-03, 15:28 | |
| uh no lets say you are up 20-0 and lose by 20-40 then another team faces saints n loses only by 3... the team that lost by only 3 has been closer you gotta count the whole game not just the 1st half.. get real | |
|
| |
XxSaints9xX New MS Member
Number of posts : 10 Registration date : 2009-09-14
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-03, 16:03 | |
| The Refs were horrible White Held Greer and pushed off and caught it for a td i mean wtf Throw the flag | |
|
| |
Link in a box New MS Member
Number of posts : 21 Registration date : 2009-10-31
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-03, 20:26 | |
| No he didn't that was just a little, comepletely legal in football it woulda been illegal if he was really shovin him, he just lightly pushed him, and Greer couldn't keep his balance, and slowed down. | |
|
| |
Ellard All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 390 Registration date : 2009-04-20
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-04, 10:51 | |
| wow you falcon fans are stubborn, a loss is a loss, losing by 3 is like losing by a 1000, YOU STILL LOST WHO DAT! | |
|
| |
hof8231 Veteran MS Member
Number of posts : 550 Registration date : 2008-12-27
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-04, 15:01 | |
| For offensive pass interference they usually won't throw the flag unless the receiver fully extends his arm. | |
|
| |
Sun All-Pro MS Member
Number of posts : 329 Registration date : 2009-09-18
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO 2009-11-04, 22:04 | |
| I hope for the Falcons that Turner woke up for real and is gonna deliver for the rest of the season. He had a huge day against the Saints (probably the reason why they stayed in the game). | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: ATL vs. NO | |
| |
|
| |
| ATL vs. NO | |
|