How will OAK be in M-11?

Spencerdb7 wrote:

MiamiXCanes wrote:

IMO any raiders user is bad on D. you control 1 person on D and letting the other 10 make plays for you doesnt make you good. there by far and away the best D on madden. playing man is cake, blitzing is cake, playing zone is cake. everything with them is easy

Well no, that's not true .... How can you say anyone who plays the raiders has bad D? that's just dumb no offence. So your saying if i got the best player on madden to use them that means he sucks at D? haha no. It would only make the D even better if they the person is good on D.

Also sometimes i'll use the Saints every now and then because I love all they're offensive weapons and FOR SOME ODD REASON I CAN STILL MAKE STOPS so I wouldn't say I suck at D. lol

so your scheme is the reason chris johnson (CB) can play man to man like a god? or why michael huff plays like a 99 cause hes fast as ****? not at all. i reached a bit when i said ALL raiders users are bad on D and i aplogize for that. ill say most raiders users are bad on D. using the weapons on O at least take a little bit of skill. you got drew brees? you still need to make the right throw to the open guy. you got andre johnson? you still need to hit him when hes open. you got AP? you still need to make the correct reads and cuts. using the best D in the game by far doesnt make you good when you only control one of those players. sure, whoever you user obviously takes good user skills. but theres 10 other players you have nothing to do with. taking credit for somebody you never even touch during the play is just sad

MiamiXCanes wrote:

Spencerdb7 wrote:

MiamiXCanes wrote:

IMO any raiders user is bad on D. you control 1 person on D and letting the other 10 make plays for you doesnt make you good. there by far and away the best D on madden. playing man is cake, blitzing is cake, playing zone is cake. everything with them is easy

Well no, that's not true .... How can you say anyone who plays the raiders has bad D? that's just dumb no offence. So your saying if i got the best player on madden to use them that means he sucks at D? haha no. It would only make the D even better if they the person is good on D.

Also sometimes i'll use the Saints every now and then because I love all they're offensive weapons and FOR SOME ODD REASON I CAN STILL MAKE STOPS so I wouldn't say I suck at D. lol

so your scheme is the reason chris johnson (CB) can play man to man like a god? or why michael huff plays like a 99 cause hes fast as ****? not at all. i reached a bit when i said ALL raiders users are bad on D and i aplogize for that. ill say most raiders users are bad on D. using the weapons on O at least take a little bit of skill. you got drew brees? you still need to make the right throw to the open guy. you got andre johnson? you still need to hit him when hes open. you got AP? you still need to make the correct reads and cuts. using the best D in the game by far doesnt make you good when you only control one of those players. sure, whoever you user obviously takes good user skills. but theres 10 other players you have nothing to do with. taking credit for somebody you never even touch during the play is just sad

Much better post then the other one make more sense lol.

But honestly be real Chris Johnson can't stop every play... Man to man but a fast reciever on a slant theres a good chance he will get open if i don't make any adjustments. Now you say i don't use any other of the 10 players isn't 100% true. I do alot of user picks if that counts. Aswell I do make a lot of adjustments depending on the play I pick and how the my opponent is playing.

MiamiXCanes wrote:

but theres 10 other players you have nothing to do with. taking credit for somebody you never even touch during the play is just sad

Also isn't this true for any team you use lol? your usuing one person and the other 10 do it for you if thats what your implying.


But You said "your scheme makes Johnson a god vs man to man?" No not really he does do most of it haha.

Raiders will beast on 2011. Their speed on d and their improved d line, plus a 6'4 MLB. Their running game will be good, plus we have a passing game. Jason Campbell to DH-B, Murphy, Schilens, and Miller

yes that is true. but i dont take credit for a INT when i didnt user it, and you shouldnt take credit for lettting others make the play. you never hear anybody say "oh my O line Game is so sick, im such a beast at it" cause nobody ever controls the Oline. i just feel like D is way to easy to be good at. and picking the best D in the game covers up some of your flaws

MiamiXCanes wrote:

yes that is true. but i dont take credit for a INT when i didnt user it, and you shouldnt take credit for lettting others make the play. you never hear anybody say "oh my O line Game is so sick, im such a beast at it" cause nobody ever controls the Oline. i just feel like D is way to easy to be good at. and picking the best D in the game covers up some of your flaws

Yeah lol.

MiamiXCanes wrote:

yes that is true. but i dont take credit for a INT when i didnt user it, and you shouldnt take credit for lettting others make the play. you never hear anybody say "oh my O line Game is so sick, im such a beast at it" cause nobody ever controls the Oline. i just feel like D is way to easy to be good at. and picking the best D in the game covers up some of your flaws

Too bad Oakland doesnt have the best D.

speed=best D

Ok look here...The Raiders will still be a good team in m-11 no matter what...Yes, the D is really good in the game and in real life...The problem is, The Raiders D haven't lived up to their full potential in real life. As for your comments Mario about you beating the Raiders and all that, add me on the ps3 and we will play 1 on 1 and I will show you whats up...Everytime I turn around, you have something clever to say about my team....I will find out what you are made of Mario. And you will find out about myself....

TheDon270 wrote:

Ok look here...The Raiders will still be a good team in m-11 no matter what...Yes, the D is really good in the game and in real life...The problem is, The Raiders D haven't lived up to their full potential in real life. As for your comments Mario about you beating the Raiders and all that, add me on the ps3 and we will play 1 on 1 and I will show you whats up...Everytime I turn around, you have something clever to say about my team....I will find out what you are made of Mario. And you will find out about myself....

hmhm thats right rofl.

dont get me wrong don, ive always been cool with you so i mean no diserespect. i just feel like the raiders covers up ALOT of flaws (if you have them) because of there speed. there SOOOOOOOOOO fast that it makes bad people good and thats not fair IMO. i feel like picking the best D (in madden) and letting them make plays for you does not make you good on D

MiamiXCanes wrote:

dont get me wrong don, ive always been cool with you so i mean no diserespect. i just feel like the raiders covers up ALOT of flaws (if you have them) because of there speed. there SOOOOOOOOOO fast that it makes bad people good and thats not fair IMO. i feel like picking the best D (in madden) and letting them make plays for you does not make you good on D

Hmm I guess thats your opinion ... but my opinion is that raiders has good D but by far doesn't make you good because you just happen to use them. I would think everyone would use them if they had Shutdown D no matter what.

like i said, it covers up flaws and holes that you may have and makes your D look better then it really is

there gona be F*CKING nasty in my 46 in oh.11 watch..

so much swag wrote:

there gona be F*CKING nasty in my 46 in oh.11 watch..

Im running the 46 as well incredible with the raiders great blitzes with coverage.

Spencerdb7 wrote:

so much swag wrote:

there gona be F*CKING nasty in my 46 in oh.11 watch..

Im running the 46 as well incredible with the raiders great blitzes with coverage.

and you know you can crash the line out ward and run threw with a safety, anygap that's how fast they get off the ball.....semore sign up,i put him at my DT' big ass hole's my n!gga try it..

so much swag wrote:

Spencerdb7 wrote:

so much swag wrote:

there gona be F*CKING nasty in my 46 in oh.11 watch..

Im running the 46 as well incredible with the raiders great blitzes with coverage.

and you know you can crash the line out ward and run threw with a safety, anygap that's how fast they get off the ball.....semore sign up,i put him at my DT' big ass hole's my n!gga try it..

i got seymore as my RE im putting him at DT now haha.

OH!!! at RE' i have the LB' with 87 speed i forgot his name,but he's there and i alway's have him in contain or crashing out or blitzing,then you come from the other side or threw a gap like i said!!!! lololololol NASTY....

TheDon270 wrote:

Ok look here...The Raiders will still be a good team in m-11 no matter what...Yes, the D is really good in the game and in real life...The problem is, The Raiders D haven't lived up to their full potential in real life. As for your comments Mario about you beating the Raiders and all that, add me on the ps3 and we will play 1 on 1 and I will show you whats up...Everytime I turn around, you have something clever to say about my team....I will find out what you are made of Mario. And you will find out about myself....

OH GOD! ok what is your GT so i can rite it down with all the others.

"Child plz" *ocho cinco voice*

so much swag wrote:

OH!!! at RE' i have the LB' with 87 speed i forgot his name,but he's there and i alway's have him in contain or crashing out or blitzing,then you come from the other side or threw a gap like i said!!!! lololololol NASTY....

just wondering putting your RE on contain opens up Gaps? Damn though dog i put Seymore at DT the Gap really opened it was crazy played first game was playing Vs charger it was 7 to 38.. when the half was over he called mercy

Spencerdb7 wrote:

MiamiXCanes wrote:

dont get me wrong don, ive always been cool with you so i mean no diserespect. i just feel like the raiders covers up ALOT of flaws (if you have them) because of there speed. there SOOOOOOOOOO fast that it makes bad people good and thats not fair IMO. i feel like picking the best D (in madden) and letting them make plays for you does not make you good on D

Hmm I guess thats your opinion ... but my opinion is that raiders has good D but by far doesn't make you good because you just happen to use them. I would think everyone would use them if they had Shutdown D no matter what.

Raiders have a top 5 defense, but you still have to play offense with them. They have a good running game, but passing wise their god awful.

CRUNK wrote:

Spencerdb7 wrote:

MiamiXCanes wrote:

dont get me wrong don, ive always been cool with you so i mean no diserespect. i just feel like the raiders covers up ALOT of flaws (if you have them) because of there speed. there SOOOOOOOOOO fast that it makes bad people good and thats not fair IMO. i feel like picking the best D (in madden) and letting them make plays for you does not make you good on D

Hmm I guess thats your opinion ... but my opinion is that raiders has good D but by far doesn't make you good because you just happen to use them. I would think everyone would use them if they had Shutdown D no matter what.

Raiders have a top 5 defense, but you still have to play offense with them. They have a good running game, but passing wise their god awful.

Yeah passing is really bad, horrible QB does get the job done with 15 yards though. For the Wrs if you user catch it really helps and miller is beast 1 of my most used recievers.

The Raiders don't quite have the best "skills" on D, but they are so quick, that if you can make up for their skills on the sticks, this D shuts down almost anyone.

so much swag wrote:

there gona be F*CKING nasty in my 46 in oh.11 watch..

Oh hell yeah they gonna be nasty. cant wait.

Yeah I wanna try out Campbell. Finally be able to stretch the field with deep passes I hope.

not too mention a better line to protect

They will be good no problem